Laserfiche WebLink
The proposed lot split does not meet finding 2, as the proposed lot split is not consistent with all <br />applicable general and specialized city, county, and regional plans, in particular the 2010 Focused Area <br />Study Plan. The Focused Area Study Plan identifies the need for a connection of the drive serving the <br />businesses on the west side of Highway 10 to the public street to the north. This proposed lot split <br />would make this connection unlikely, to the detriment of the businesses in the area that rely on vehicular <br />access. <br />The proposed lot split does not meet finding 3 because it creates a lot that provides less than 3,000 <br />square feet of buildable land, well under the minimum size for C-3 zoning lots, and well below the <br />minimum buildable area for the type and density of development and uses contemplated in the C-3 <br />zoning district. <br />The proposed lot split does not meet fording 7 because it would have an adverse impact on the adjacent <br />parcels by making the connection of roads unlikely, therefore hampering the development and use of the <br />lots on the west side of Highway 10. <br />Lastly, the lot configuration also appears to be inconsistent with Section 30-477 of the City Code, which <br />requires that lot remnants be attached to adjacent lots rather than allowed to remain as unusable parcels. <br />Lot remnants are lots that house storm water features and offer no buildable site. Historically, the city <br />has required these to be attached to a buildable lot, to avoid a situation where the property owner neglects <br />the parcel requiring the city to acquire the property in a tax forfeiture situation to preserve the storm <br />water features. <br />Park dedication. The comment letter mentions a park dedication requirement. Park dedication is not <br />required per section 30-327 (d) of the City Code. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT <br />None <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />^ Location Map <br />^ Applicants Narrative <br />^ Staff Comment Letter Dated May 21, 2012 <br />^ Ciry Code Section 30-375, Required Findings for Subdivision Approval <br />^ Subdivision Proposal <br />QCtlOtl \~fotion b}~ Second by Vote <br />Follow Up <br />