Laserfiche WebLink
Disposal sites <br /> <br />It is proposed that material removed from the lake be disposed of on upland sites in the <br />immediate vicinity. This avoids having to reload the material into on-road trucks. The <br />top soil will be removed from the disposal sites, the material will be spread and <br />compacted by a bulldozer, the topsoil will be replaced and the sites will then be <br />immediately seeded and mulched. So the sediment placed on the disposal sites does not <br />impede future development, except for berms proposed as sound barrier from adjacent US <br />Trunk Highway #10, the typical depth of the material deposited will only be <br />approximately 3 feet. The city will contract the services of a geotechnical engineer <br />during construction to verify and document the conditions of the disposal sites. Sheet 2 <br />of 2 of the attached Lake Orono Improvement Proiect Site Plans shows the locations of <br />the disposal sites, quantities, and details on erosion control measures. <br /> <br />Core samples of the sediment in the lake were taken and analyzed. The city worked with <br />MPCA to identify the sampling locations and what parameters were tested for. The <br />sediment was determined to be clean and MPCA has indicated they have no concerns <br />with the quality of this material. <br /> <br />Duration of construction <br /> <br />The proposal is to draw the lake down in early August of 1998 and begin sediment <br />removal in mid-August. The construction will be completed on or before October 31, <br />1998. At predicted flow rates, it is estimated that the lake can be brought back to its <br />normal water levels within four days, prior to freeze-up. <br /> <br />The above iime frame was selected to minimize impacts on fisheries, wildlife (especially <br />waterfowl) and the summer recreational use of the lake. Further, the time period selected <br />should be one of the driest of the year. <br /> <br />Beneficiaries of the project <br /> <br />The City of Elk River feels that the project described is imperative. Not only will the <br />immediate lake owners benefit, but Lake Orono is a regional recreation facility enjoyed <br />by thousands of non-lake owners each year. Further, because it draws people to Elk <br />River, the lake is an economic resource for the community and Sherburne County. <br /> <br />Alternatives <br /> <br />Without a project the lake will continue to decline and pose additional safety hazard to <br />boating. Due to the very low sedimentation yield in the Elk River, additional best <br />management practices within the watershed will facilitate maintenance of the sediment <br />yield, but can not be expected to significantly reduce it. No feasible alternative for <br />keeping a reasonable water depth in the lake besides sediment removal has been <br /> <br /> <br />