|
.ITIES 1, MUAfICIppI, BIGHTS, POWERS, DUTIES
<br />t village
<br />sge, and
<br />then pa. .
<br />vspaper, ;
<br />t of the
<br />ublis6ed
<br />1 by law
<br />mayor
<br />uthoriu
<br />material
<br />2776-1,
<br />sed by
<br />vich a
<br />mer but
<br />+ed, the
<br />to value
<br />Op.Atry.
<br />thibited
<br />az offi-
<br />he was
<br />;age on
<br />of own-
<br />uly 25,
<br />of cor-
<br />aper in
<br />mani-
<br />dishing
<br />seek to
<br />in the
<br />:, Sept
<br />depen-
<br />te only
<br />ct had
<br />spaper
<br />boazd,
<br />i each
<br />.t was
<br />r, who
<br />fired [o
<br />;e vote
<br />v. 19,
<br />volved
<br />m un-
<br />it city
<br />bank.
<br />W.2d
<br />eanor
<br />unty's
<br />ad no
<br />ounry
<br />igna4
<br />ed by board of auditors az county depository,
<br />did not prevent bank Crom becoming de jure
<br />depository. Marshall County v. Bakke, 1930,
<br />Mme- 10, 234 N.W. 1. Counties ~ 102;
<br />Deposits And Escrows ~ 31
<br />loss~ety for school treazurer was not liable for
<br />of w rough failure of de facto depository bank,
<br />hick treasurer was officer. School Dist.
<br />No. 1, Itasca County v. Aiton, 1928, 173 Minn.
<br />428' 217 N.W. 496. Schools ~ 63(4)
<br />Cashier of one of two depositories available to
<br />the city could file Eor the office of city treasurer
<br />where the cashier was not a stockholder of the
<br />6~, had no voice in the management of the
<br />dent and whose compensation was not depen-
<br />Gen.; 9p~n new business or profits. Op.Atty.
<br />E-2, March 18, 1963.
<br />Member of a hospital board controlled, man-
<br />aged and operated by the city would be a public
<br />officer within the terms of § 471.87 and N view
<br />§ 471.89
<br />of this hospital could not deposit Eunds in the
<br />bank of which the board member was president
<br />and held stock. Op.Atty.Gen., 90e-2, Nov. 23,
<br />1960.
<br />A county treasurer could act az a direcmr of a
<br />national bank in his counTy wherein counTy
<br />deposited Cunds. Op.Atty.Gen.1940, No. 114, p.
<br />158.
<br />12. Dog kennels
<br />Whether arrangement, whereby village coun-
<br />cil trustee and member, who owned dog kennel,
<br />and who was licensed dogcatcher for several of
<br />surrounding communities .outside village,
<br />charged village dogcatcher for use of dog ken-
<br />nel fell within any of the exceptions enumerated
<br />in this section is a Eact question to be deter-
<br />mined by Village Council. Op.Atty.Gen.,
<br />90-A-1, Feb. 9, 1955.
<br />471'$$1. Exceptions; application
<br />The exceptions provided in section 471.88 shall apply notwithstanding the
<br />provisions of any other statute or city charter. ~~''~i~
<br />Laws 1967, c. 18, § 1, eff. Feb. 25, 1967. I l t17 ~7 y/.~, e ~~
<br />Library References ~1' ~J ~ "~ f ~ I r` ~
<br />Municipal Corporations o=78, 79.
<br />Westlaw Topic No. 268. ~-/ -(J~(1,f 1 ~.
<br />C.J.S. Municipal Corporations § 193. 1 VVV
<br />Notes of Decisions
<br />Bankg 1
<br />Town boards 2 also a counTy commissioner. .Atty.Gen., 906,
<br />May 28, 1968.
<br />t• Banks
<br />own `new of the fact that this section applies
<br />Y to subds. 2 through l l of § 471.88, but not
<br />to subd. 1 of § 471.88, a county could not
<br />Po perly designate a hank as a deposito of
<br />utity hinds when a director of the bank was
<br />2. Town boards
<br />General prohibition f § 365.37, that a mwn
<br />board may not co act with one of its own
<br />members is rende d inapplicable by § 471.81
<br />to contracu w ' h meet the requirements of
<br />§ 471.88. Op tTy.Gen., 322a-2, Ott. 4, 1968.
<br />471.89.
<br />~...utvls n 1. Procedure
<br />471.88, s division 5, is v~ oid
<br />and 3 is Fo nu.n
<br />contract made pursuant to section
<br />cedure prescribed by subdivisions 2
<br />~ubd. 2, Resolution by governing body. Except in an emergency making
<br />such procedure impracticable, the governing body of the governmental unit
<br />shall authorize the contract in advance of its performance by adoptine a
<br />or lower
<br />contract
<br />~6
<br />i
<br />i
<br />i
<br />case of an ewer en a contract cannot
<br />629
<br />
|