Laserfiche WebLink
CONSTRUCTION <br />Co~e~a~AVe ~~~t~~ <br />t+ ~ , fi c:J~ae~t~n re ;:cJ~ rs_re <br />znsee s°. <br />€~'>ii'iN3" 9":2-63fi-R6CJfJ <br />saa~€.tcT~ o~e;tc~s <br />s>t_n>r, vt <br />€vcR-ra€.t=r~fJ ;:xe~:uriu: <br />pr tiC( CEt••t7CR <br />~tt.e~}txiiiv'CJr., i~€ra <br />:'3gR:'dANi7Jei..f: i. kiCti. <br />CJf'1-iCE BARN, <br />February 15, 2012 <br />Mr. Tim .Simon <br />City of Elk.River <br />13065 Orono Parkway <br />Elk River, MN 55330 <br />RE: Elk River Public Works <br />Recommendations for Award of Contract -Bid Package 2 <br />Dear Tim,. <br />On January 31, 2012 bids were received at the City of Elk'River for Elk River Public Works - <br />Bid, Package #2. A total of 124 bids were received for twenty (20) bid categories. Also, a <br />total of 51 quotes were received by RJM Construction for thirteen (13) quote categories. <br />Attached is a bid summary by'trade for each bid category and quote category. <br />After the most recent budget of $9,579,135 was established the team decided to remove select <br />items from the base bid scope of work and bid them as alternates. This way the project <br />would have the flexibility'to accept or reject alternate scopes of work depending on the final <br />project cost after bids were received. RJM Construction is pleased to report that based on <br />bids received, the project is $314,6'14 under the most recent budget.. Therefore. alternate <br />scopes' of work can. be added back into the project while staying within budget. If bids had <br />come in over budget then the alternate scopes of work would have been rejected. <br />After reviewing the project cost with the City of Elk River staff it has been recommended to <br />accept alternates 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, and 1'3 for a total of $273,4:12. Alternate number 5 for the fuel <br />island canopy will not be accepted or rejected at this time; it will be on hold until a decision is <br />made later in the project. Alternates 6, 7, and 8 for the existing building renovations will be <br />rejected; however,. a budget of $70,000 will be in the project cost to quote out a reduced <br />scope of existing building renovations at a later date. Alternates 10, l 1, and 12 will be <br />rejected. Unit price # 1 will be accepted. and will be part of the contract for bid category32A <br />Asphalt Paving. Attached is a summary of the'total base bid as well as the alternate bids. <br />RJM has completed it's review of the bids and,in addition to the bid review, we have also <br />conducted a scope review with the apparent low bidder for each bid and quote category. <br />Based on the results of these reviews we recommend to the City Council that they award the <br />contracts as follows: <br />.BID CATEGORY... <br />AWARD AMOUNT <br />3A -Concrete and Masonry <br />Axel Ohman, Inc. <br />247 West 61 S` Street <br />Minneapolis, MN 55419 <br />$930,000:.00 <br />