My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1. - 5.5. SR 02-009-1998
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1998
>
02/09/1998 - SPECIAL
>
5.1. - 5.5. SR 02-009-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:05 AM
Creation date
9/22/2003 9:04:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
2/9/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Guardian Angels, 10/22/97 <br />page 2 <br /> <br />assisted living in tier two. The answer to this question is yes. In our opinion this can be done under the <br />present ordinance and according to the preliminary calculations this would yield an allowable density of <br />72 units. In order to get the 80 units you desire you would need to ask for a variance. However, <br />considering the physical limitations of the property a minor variance of 3200 ft2 in this situation, I <br />believe could be justified. <br /> <br />With this clarification it appears that the shoreland ordinance will allow you to develop the 20 units of <br />townhomes in tier one, 72 units of assisted living in tier two, and a commercial building in tier three of <br />43,173 ft~, without any variances to the shoreland standard. Again, please bare in mind that this assumes <br />that all the other standards for open space, stormwater, etc.., are also met as well as any other city codes. <br /> <br />Lastly, I have checked into the issues that were brought up, regarding Cambridge. Rather than going <br />into great detail, it appears that this would have no bearing on your situation. Specifically, the City <br />allowed commercial development (the assisted living) to occur in an area where commercial <br />development is prohibited (the Wild and Scenic River district). <br /> <br />I hope that this clarifies the department position as well as allow you to go forward with design process. <br />I strongly recommend that you work with the city staff to resolve all of the outstanding issues and not <br />focus on the shoreland standards. <br /> <br />..~cerely, <br /> Larry Kramka <br />Area Hydrologist <br /> <br />Ce <br /> <br />David Hills, Regional Hydrologist <br />City of Elk River <br /> / <br />Michael Trossen, Trossen Wright Architects P.A. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.