Laserfiche WebLink
metro municipal in the survey. This, however, ignores the local labor competition that <br />borders E1tMLI. <br />The numbers indicate that during the last three years of economic downturn, the ERMU <br />Journeyman Lineworker position wage rate has fallen behind the local labor competition to <br />the bottom. For the Utilities to get into a better position for retention and development of <br />future leaders, the Utilities would need to do three things. First, the Utilities would need to <br />cease falling fixrther behind by at minimum keeping pace with the labor wage trend. Second <br />and in addition minimum of keeping pace with the labor wage trend, the Utilities would need <br />to work towards eliminating the wage disparity by chipping away at the difference. Third, <br />the Utilities would need to communicate the intent of the company's direction to the <br />employees to rebuild trust and build.loyalty and commitment. Last yeaz staff proposed <br />similar concept with a plan to work towazds re-obtaining the metro-average. With the <br />current wage dispazity and assuming a constant trend in labor wage change as indicated this <br />yeaz, the ERMU Journeyman Lineworker position could reach the metro-average in 2 years <br />by awarding a 5% wage increase each of those 2 yeazs. It would take 3 yeazs with an annual <br />increase of 4%, 7 years with an annual increase of 3%, and 25 years with an annual increase <br />of 2.5%. Once behind, it becomes difficult to catch up. The further behind the wage gets, <br />the more drastic the measures needed to eliminate the disparity. <br />Benefits <br />Of course wages are only one component to the compensation package. Insurance, vacation, <br />holidays, and other benefits also are part of the complete compensation package. It was <br />discussed in the Committee meeting that ERMU has an excellent health insurance plan with a <br />generous employer contribution. One of the other similar municipal utilities in the survey <br />does have the exact same health insurance plan with a similaz employer contribution; the <br />others have HSAs or high deductible insurance plans. In 2010, staff conducted an extensive <br />analysis of the metro-average survey utilities' of their benefits which including health <br />insurance. At that time this information had been presented to the Commission. This <br />analysis was also reviewed by the Committee in October. <br />For 2012, E12MU's health insurance plan renewal will recognize a 9.5% decrease in rates, or <br />an approximate overall savings of $49,746. Based onthe-current 80/20 health insurance cost <br />sharing, the employer shaze of this savings is $39,796.80. <br />The Dental, Long Term Disability (LTD), and Life Insurance were also discussed by the <br />Committee because ERMiJ received notice of the substantial increase in the renewal rates <br />which would result in an overall increase of $9,819.72. Based on the current 75/25 dental <br />insurance cost shazing and the current 100% employer coverage for LTD and life insurance, <br />the employer share of these components' increase in cost from the prior yeaz is $8,195.28. <br />An effort in negotiating these increases downwazd by our insurance broker was unsuccessful <br />so we went out for bids on these insurance items. The low alternate bid for the LTD and Life <br />through Sunlife would decrease the employer cost from the prior yeaz by $2,719.68. The low <br />alternate bid for the Dental through Metlife would decrease the employer cost from the prior <br />yeaz by $400.28. Further analysis into the Metlife network found that less than 20% of the <br />employees' current dentists would be covered as "in-network". The cost to the employer to <br />renew our current dental based on the 75/25 cost sharing is an increase from the prior year of <br />$4,873.32. <br />