Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 <br />Regular meeting of the Elk River Municipal Urilities Commission <br />October 11, 2011 <br />In 2010 and 2011, ERMU utilized a new process in evaluating wage increases. This new <br />process for handling wage increase proposals was handled over two separate commission meetings. <br />During the first meeting, management provides industry comparisons, economic trends, and financial <br />impact to ERMU. Included was the metro average survey of the seven predetern~ined peer utilities <br />that have been used in the past, the Consumer Price Index (CPI), and benefit survey. The employees <br />have been provided the opportunity to bring suggestions and requests to management. This <br />information was reviewed and considered by management and then included in the presentation to the <br />commission. At the discretion of the commission, employees were afforded the opportunity to <br />address the commission during the first of the two meeting process. The topic would then be tabled <br />until the following utility commission meeting at which the commission would make their decision. <br />Troy Adams discovered during the surveying process that Shakopee Public Utilities has <br />developed a very successful method of addressing wages and benefits. They formed a committee <br />assembled of management and commissioners to assess wages and benefits. Discussion followed. <br />Daryl Thompson recommended John Dietz to be on the committee. John Dietz asked how many <br />meetings, staff responded bi-annual. Daryl Thompson felt it was owed to the employees to be able to <br />voice their opinion. Al Nadeau agreed. Troy Adams said the first meeting would be for staff input <br />and the second would be for going over the information and surveys to present to the commission for <br />their decision. <br />Daryl Thompson moved to create a Wage and Benefits Committee consisting of Theresa <br />Slominski, Troy Adams, Mark Fuchs, and John Dietz, with Judy McSpadden as Recording <br />Secretary. AI Nadeau seconded the mofion. Motion carried 3-0. <br />5.3 Review 2012 Expense and Conservation Improvement Program Budgets <br />Year to date, wholesale power costs make up approximately 74% of operating revenue. <br />Ultimately, the wholesale rates set by Great River Energy (GRE) have an enormous impact on <br />ERMU's rates. GRE is still in the process of finalizing their 2012 wholesale power rate. Through <br />recent discussions, the preliminary numbers indicate a wholesale power cost increase to ERMU of <br />14%. John Dietz asked if this all has to be passed onto the customer, Troy Adanrs responded not all. <br />John Dietz asked if the data centers are still ramping up on their power consumption. Troy Adams <br />said they continue to add electric load. Discussion followed regazding rates and peak loads. The <br />Tazget Data Center is on an Interruptible Load Program and it would save GRE and ERMU <br />approximately $1 million in the next year if United Health Group (UHG) was also on the program. <br />Consensus was to pursue getting UHG on the Interruptible Load Program. John Dietz stated he wants <br />to keep rates as minimal as possible and try to stay cost neutral. <br />The water rate analysis conducted in the spring of 2010 established a cash flow plan that <br />resulted in the rates remaining unchanged thru 2012. The 2012 forecast for water sales is slightly <br />down and the water connections aze slightly up. There is also the continued revenue from the water <br />