Laserfiche WebLink
2. See #1 above. <br />3. A courtesy phone call is not a part of the official notice requirements. (There is no phone <br />number listed for KAAP Enterprises, the listed property owner in county records.) <br />4. The date a letter is signed for is entirely independent from the contents of the letter. <br />5. A copy of the applicable portion of the January 2011 newsletter is attached. The newsletter <br />was distributed by mail to all addresses in the city the week of January 18, 2011. The <br />newsletter articles are intended to be informative, but not regulatory. Newsletter articles do <br />not have the force of official notice in enforcement. <br />City staff followed established, written procedure for the notification and abatement of identified <br />nuisances for this parcel. For this reason and the responses listed above, staff recommends the appeal be <br />denied. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT <br />If the appeal is approved, the $125 charge would be the responsibility of the taxpayers. <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />Excerpt of Winter 2010-11 The Elk Kiver Current newsletter <br />Copy of letter sent to property owner dated January 11, 2011 <br />Appeal e-mail from property owner <br />Action Motion by Second by Vote <br />Follow Up <br />N:\PubGc Bodies\City Council\Coundl RCA\Agenda Packet\i1-21-2011\Appeal Monroe 3.docx <br />