My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1. ERMUSR STAFF UPDATES 11-15-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2011
>
11-15-2011
>
6.1. ERMUSR STAFF UPDATES 11-15-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2011 8:30:13 AM
Creation date
11/15/2011 8:29:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
11/15/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Voters in Boulder, Colo., approve ballot measures that could lead to a new public power u... Page 1 of 2 <br />Public Power Ouily <br />Tbunday, November 3, 2°11 <br />Voters in Boulder, Colo., approve ballot measures that could <br />lead to a new public power utility <br />Public power may be coming to Boulder, Colo. <br />Residents of the Colorado community on Nov. 1 approved two ballot measures that will allow the city <br />to continue to explore the possibility of purchasing Xcel Energy's distribution system and forming a <br />city-owned electric utility. <br />Ballot measure 2C, which authorizes the creation of such a utility if customer rates would be the same <br />as those Xcel Energy is charging at the time of acquisition, passed with 51.78% of the total vote. A <br />companion measure, 2B, provides the funding necessary to determine the actual costs of buying <br />Xcel's system and starting a local utility. It passed with support from 50.27% of voters, the city said. <br />While the margins are narrow, the city attorney said the results are not close enough, as defined in <br />local statutes, to trigger an automatic recount. <br />Xcel spent about $950,000 to fight the measures, while supporters spent about $87,500, according to <br />the local newspaper, the Daily Camera. The total spent so far makes the fight over these ballot <br />measures the most expensive political issue in Boulder's history, the newspaper said. <br />"This vote shows, once again, that the Boulder community wants to chart a new course -one that <br />makes cleaner energy a priority while also taking into account other core values, such as rates, <br />reliability and a desire for more control," said City Manager Jane S. Brautigam. "We need to <br />recognize, however, that this was a close decision. There aze still a lot of questions and concerns that <br />we need to address. The city is committed to moving forward in a deliberate, but measured, <br />thoughtful and inclusive way." <br />The impetus behind this particular effort to create a municipal utility appears to be driven in large part <br />by a desire for cleaner, more renewable sources of energy. <br />A telephone survey this summer found that Boulder voters support creation of a city-owned electric <br />utility by a wide margin and that residents overwhelmingly want a reduction in carbon emissions. <br />Seventy-one percent of survey respondents said they support municipalization and said they thought <br />the city would be better than Xcel Energy at offering renewable sources of energy and at reducing <br />carbon emissions. A smaller, but majority, percentage (57%) thought the city would do a better job <br />than Xcel Energy at finding innovative solutions to energy problems. <br />Ninety-one percent of those surveyed said they would support an increase of between 5% and "as <br />much as it takes" in their monthly electric bills to reduce carbon emissions and/or increase renewable <br />sources of energy. (See the Aup. 22 Public Power Daily.) <br />The vote in favor of the ballot measures "does not mean that municipalization is imminent," the city <br />said in a press release. "A decision about whether to form a local electric utility has yet to be made." <br />http://www.naylometwork.com/app-ppd/articles/print-V2.asp?aid=158485 11/7/2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.