My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-09-2011 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2010 - 2019
>
2011
>
08-09-2011 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2011 9:08:21 AM
Creation date
10/13/2011 9:08:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
8/9/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 <br />August 9, 2011 <br />--------------------------- <br />B) CONTINUANCE OF THE BERM ALONG 221ST AVE TO THE WEST. <br />• THIS BERM SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF ANY <br />TREES WITHIN 1,000 FEET TO THE NORTH OF THIS BERM. <br />3. THE STANDARDS FOR ISSUANCE OF THE CONDITIONAL USE <br />PERMIT SHALL CONTINUE TO BE MAINTAINED. <br />4. APPROVAL OF THE CUP AMENDMENT TO MINE THE 8.9 ACRE <br />BUFFER AREA SHALL NOT TAKE EFFECT UNLESS AND UNTIL <br />WMI'S APPLICATION TO AMEND ITS CUP TO DEPOSIT WASTE IN <br />THIS AREA IS APPROVED, WITH THE EXCEPTION THAT TILLER <br />MAY IMMEDIATELY BEGIN MINING ON THE END OF THE 8.9 ACRE <br />BUFFER, WITHOUT REMOVING ANY SIGNIFICANT TREES ON THE <br />EAST END FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING THE BERM <br />IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED IN # 1 ABOVE. <br />MOTION CARRIED 6-0. <br />5:5. Request byCit~of ElkRiverfor Conditional Use Permit forPublic Worl~ Facility, Public <br />Hearing -Case No. CU 11-14 <br />The staff report was presented by Chris Leeseberg. He explained that approval of the CUP <br />would authorize Phase I to occur this fall, with bidding to take place for Phase II this winter. <br />Mr. Leeseberg reviewed the plans for Phase I and II as detailed in the attachments to the <br />staff report dated August 9, 2011. He noted that the landscape plan is not yet completed <br />and screening of the yard will be the main focus. He noted that there will only be one wall <br />• sign and either a new monument sign or relocation of the existing sign. Staff recommended <br />approval of the CUP with the three conditions listed in the staff report. <br />Commissioner Anderson asked if the project will meet the city's standards regarding design, <br />landscaping, and signage. Mr. Leeseberg stated that there are no specific design standards <br />for the I1 zoning district the site is located iri. Commissioner Anderson stated that he felt the <br />large orange numbers on the loading doors were distasteful. <br />Commissioner Lemke stated that he liked the numbers and felt theyfit the modern design of <br />the building. <br />Commissioner Scott stated that the city may wish to consider some consistency in the design <br />and color scheme for this building in comparison to other city buildings. Mr. Leeseberg <br />stated that the library and cityhall campus buildings are vastly different in architectural <br />design. <br />Commissioner Ives stated he felt the big orange numbers on the doors give the impression <br />of a storage facility. <br />Chair Ives opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, Chair Ives closed <br />the public hearing. <br />Commissioner Anderson recommended that landscaping be utilized to screen the new <br />facilityfrom County Road 1/Proctor as much as possible. <br />• Commissioner Lemke asked what LEED certification this building will have. Mark <br />Thompson, Assistant Street Superintendent, stated that LEED practices and principles will <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.