07-12-2011 PC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Comnussion Minutes July 12, 2011 --------------------------- the streets are not up to normal city standards with curb and gutter. He suggested that the • applicant encourage carpooling to reduce the number of cars. He stated that if there is a real problem with traffic safety, the police would likely be notified. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LEMKE AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WESTBERG TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY DEVIN PETERSON ON BEHALF OF THE THAI BUDDHIST CENTER FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN INSTITUTIONAL USE, CASE NO. CU 11-08, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. AS A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT, THE APPLICANT SHALL RECEIVE ALL REQUIRED PERMITS. 2. THE STANDARDS FOR ISSUANCE OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SHALL BE SATISFIED IN PERPETUITY. 3. THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL MEET ALL APPLICABLE FIRE CODES. 4. PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS SHALL PROVIDE FOR ADA COMPLIANCE PARKING SPACES, A 24-FOOT WIDE DRIVE AISLE, AND CONCRETE CURBING AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY STAFF PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 5. AN ADDRESS NUMBER MUST BE DISPLAYED AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE PROPERTY. 6. NO MORE THAN THREE FREESTANDING ACCESSORY STRUCTURES BE PROVIDED (E.G. SHED, GAZEBO, AND INSTITUTIONAL SPACE). MOTION CARRIED 6-1. Commissioner Johnson opposed. 5.2. Request by Guardian Angels for a Conditional Use Permit to amend the Planned Unit Development Agreement for Guardian Angels West, 13439 185~h Ave NW, Public Hearing - Case No. CU 11-09 Mr. Barnhart stated that the original PUD agreement for Guardian Angels West included 20 additional units in Phase 2. He stated that they are now proposing 30 units. He noted that the additional units does not raise the density overall. He explained that in the original review, a variance was granted to allow increased impervious surface area. Mr. Barnhart stated that the proposed footprint actually decreases that amount. He stated that Phase 2 is consistent with the original request and staff recommended approval of the PUD amendment. Commissioner Anderson asked if another variance is required for Phase 2. Mr. Barnhart stated no. Chair Ives opened the public hearing. There being no one to speak for or against the matter, Chair Ives closed the public hearing. Commissioner Bell asked if the CityEngineer's comments on page 4 of the staff report will be addressed. Mr. Barnhart stated yes, theywould. Page 3 • MOTION BY COMMISSIONER JOHNSON AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LEMKE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE