Laserfiche WebLink
Elk River~i: <br />Municipal U <br />13069 Orono Parkway • P.O. Box 430 <br />Elk River, bIN 55330-0430 <br />UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING <br />P~OgWpEAEUnr <br />1 tl/''~~VI~~ <br />P p W E R E D T O S E R V E <br />Phone: 763.441.2020 <br />Fax: 763.441.8099 <br />TO: FROM: <br />Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission Theresa Slominski -Finance and Office <br />John Dietz -Chair Manager <br />Daryl Thompson -Vice Chair <br />Al Nadeau -Trustee <br />MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: <br />October 11, 2011 6.1 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br />Staff U dates -Finance Director/Office Mana er <br />DISCUSSION: <br />We had 1086 credit card payment transactions in September, compared to 935 in August. The <br />fee for September should be $2,443.50. <br />We had our audit interviews Monday, October 3rd with the interview team of Tim Simon, Lori <br />Zeimer, Lori Stitch, Lorrie Franz, Bob Pearson, and myself. The three auditing firms that were <br />interviewed were the current auditors Abdo Eick & Meyers, and competing firms Larson Allen, <br />and Kern Dewenter Viere (KDV). All three firms presented well, proposed a reduced rate from <br />our prior audit rates, and all firms' proposals were very comparable in price (for ERMU. The <br />quotes varied more for the City.) In evaluation of the proposing auditing companies, the items <br />we were most focused on was experience with Municipal Utilities of Electric and Water. <br />Recognizing that an audit firm provides more of a service than an annual audit, but a partner in <br />addressing challenges within our industry related to many varied financial aspects, we felt this <br />was extremely important. The team is meeting again on Friday, October 7`h to determine final <br />recommendations. <br />All auditors also provided a quote for performing the audit with a separate component for <br />preparing the audit report (as requested.) A consideration I would like to address is the <br />preparation of the report for the upcoming year. Recognizing that we will have reduced audit <br />fees, regardless of the final firm selection, I would propose that we have the auditing firm <br />prepare the actual audit report this year, while we internally prepare the audit report and position <br />ourselves to do it entirely the following year. This allows us more opportunity to work with the <br />auditors side by side in its creation so efficiencies can be identified and the best processes <br />adopted. Especially if a new audit firm is selected, this would allow us transition time to produce <br />the best quality report. <br />