My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.2.B. PRSR 10-12-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
P&R Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2011
>
10-12-2011
>
7.2.B. PRSR 10-12-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2011 12:18:24 PM
Creation date
10/10/2011 12:15:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PRSR
date
10/12/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 <br />April l 1, 2006 <br />Mr. Clark noted that the main issues the Commission should address are: <br />Come to a consensus on the land use amendment and the zoning change. <br />Discuss park dedication fees (the applicant disagrees with staff's recommendation) <br />Review building elevations. <br />^ Discussion regarding grading and drainage plan (due to elimination of curbing and <br />utilizing a low impact drainage plan). <br />Signage (applicant is requesting a variance with Board of Adjustmenu after this item <br />is discussed). <br />Commissioner Anderson stated be was concerned about the removal of the drainage pond <br />for the Lefebvre Addition. <br />Mr. Maurer stated the outlot in the Lefebvre Addition is an unbuildable remnant. He stated <br />the pond is actually on the Ford property and is going to be replaced in a different area in <br />order to utilize the Lefebvre oudot for four additional light industrial lots. He stated the <br />pond is not for drainage of the Lefebvre property. <br />Comaussioner Offemran stated it makes sense to rezone the parcel to Highway Business. He <br />questioned whether the access into Elk River Ford should be moved further away from <br />I-3igltway 10 (off 171' Avenue) because it may interfere with Mn/DOT's interchange plans. <br />Mr. Maurer stated the Houle Oil site will eventually be developed and need a driveway <br />access. He stated the driveways for each site would line up at this location. Mr. Maurer stated <br />the Houle site has a lot of wetlands and the access into Ford is the farthest most easterly <br />spot a driveway could be installed without drastically impacting wetlands on the Houle site <br />when their driveway in installed <br />Mr. Maurer stated Mn/DOT's IRC does not indicate where an interchange wi71 go along TH <br />10 in Elk River. He believes the intersection will be further south between 173~d Avenue and <br />165 Avenue because it is currently undeveloped and land acquisition would be easier and <br />more affordable. <br />Mr. Maurer stated the applicant is eliminating a direct access from Highway 10 and will be <br />directing traffic to 173•d or 171nAvenues, both controlled intersettions. <br />Chair Lemke questioned when TH 10 is bu>7t to freeway standards, if the accesses at 171• <br />and 173 Avenues would be closed. <br />Mr. Maurer stated they most likely would be closed and the city would be involved with <br />constmcting a frontage or backage road. <br />Chair Lemke opened the public hearing for the land use plan amendment from Light <br />Industrial to Highway Business. <br />Scotx Powell, Elk River Ford Owner-Stated he is budding a quality, safe, and <br />environmentally sound project. He stated he was available for questions. <br />Chair Lemke questioned if the applicant is voluntarrly closing the direct TH 10 entrance into <br />Ford. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.