Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />City Counal Muiutes <br />Apri117, 2006 <br />Page 9 <br />11. TH ING SQUARE FOOTAGE OF BUILDINGS <br />THE AP D PUD WILL NEED TO BE 1,220 <br />SQUARE FEE . <br />12. A SEPARATE LETTER IN THE AMOUNT' OF $50,000, <br />SHALL BE PROM OVERIN TE IMPROVEMENTS FOR <br />LOT 2 BLOC 1C RIDGE CENTER 2 OR TO ISSUING THE <br />GRADIN BUILDING PERMITS. <br />MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br />• <br />6.7. Request by Elk River Ford for Variance Relating to Siena Pue,_j b,_ lic Hearin~Case No V <br />06-03 <br />6.8. Resolution for Land Use Amendment to Change Land Use from Light Industrial to <br />-~Iighway Business as Requested by Elk River Ford. Public Hearing-Case No LU 06-03 <br />6.9. Ordinance For Zone Change from Planned Unit Development to Highway Commerdal as <br />6.10. <br />6.11. <br />6.12. <br />Mr. Harlidtex reviewed all of these requests as outlined in his staff reports. <br />Mayor HIinzing opened the public hearing. <br />Scott Powell, applicant-Stated he wanted to build a safe project for the community and he <br />is proud of the environmental aspects of the project He stated the signage meets all the <br />criteria fox a variance. He stated he has in excess of 1,200' of frontage along the highway, is <br />closing one access on the highway, bringing in two new businesses on one lot, and that it is <br />very difficult for customers to access his location without the signage. <br />Dana Anderson, 12368 speaking as a resident (he is a member of the Planning <br />Commission)-Stated he liked the overall project design. He questioned the legal <br />interpretation of park dedication requirements..He stated that it is important to collect park <br />dedication fees. <br />Steve Rohr representing the applicant-Stated the phases of the project may change. He <br />questioned the definition of cut-off lighting. Mr. Rohlf stated the existing dealership should <br />not pay park dedication fees as consistent with Section 30-327 of the City Code, which states <br />that pazk dedication fees apply to undeveloped property. He stated the aty is confusing <br />undeveloped with unplatted He stated the property is not being subdivided but rather <br />combined. He stated the only reason they aze platting the property is because it is a <br />condition to secure a building pemut He stated to diaxge in excess of $100,000 for pazk <br />dedication fees to a business trying to expand and create more jobs is unreasonable. <br />• <br />Mr. Hazlicker explained that cut-off lighting directs light downwazd as opposed to a globe <br />light, which is exposed. <br />Mayor I{linzing dosed the public hearing. <br />