My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.2.B. PRSR 10-12-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
P&R Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2011
>
10-12-2011
>
7.2.B. PRSR 10-12-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2011 12:18:24 PM
Creation date
10/10/2011 12:15:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PRSR
date
10/12/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes <br />Apn] 11, 2006 <br />Page 9 <br />Chair Lemke stated staff recommendation has determined this fee and he questioned their <br />process. <br />Mr. Clark stated they aze following the ordinance. He stated the staff's recommendation was <br />reviewed with the city attorney. <br />Chair Lemke stated a vote should be taken on the motion and the Commission could make a <br />recommendation to the Counal regarding pazk dedication fees. <br />C~rair Lemke asked for an explanation of low impact drainage plans, which Mr. Maurer <br />explained. <br />MOTION CARRIED 5-2. Commissioners Offetman and Westgaazd opposed. <br />Commissioner Westgaard stated the applicant has been wrlling to work with the city on <br />several issues and some consideration for park dedication fees should be given to the <br />applicant for his existing business. <br />Commissioner Ropp concurred. <br />Commissioner Anderson stated the city can't azbitrazily reduce park dedication fees and the <br />Commission should not be discussing this item. <br />Commissioner Stevens concurred. <br />Chair Lemke opened the public hearing on the conditional use permit. <br />Steve Rohlf, Ford representative-Stated Ford may be changing the order of their phases. <br />There being no further comments regarding this issue, Chair Lemke closed the public <br />hearing. <br />Commissioner Stevens stated he is sad to seethe existing tower being removed. <br />Commissioner Offexrnan questioned the lighting standards. He stated auto dealerships tend <br />to over light their locations at the entrances. He questioned the lights along the entrance. <br />Mr. Rohlf stated the lights would be low profile decorative lights. <br />Mr. Harlicker stated the applicant is meeting the lighting requirements. <br />Commissioner Offerman requested a condition added for lighting at the entrances that shall <br />meet at minimum semi cut-off classification. <br />MOVED BY COMMISSIONER OFFERMAN AND SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER ANDERSON TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ELK RIVER FORD WITH THE <br />FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: <br />1. ALL COMMENTS OF THE CITY ENGINEER SHALL BE <br />ADDRESSED. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.