My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.4. SR 12-15-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1997
>
12/15/1997
>
7.4. SR 12-15-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:02 AM
Creation date
9/3/2003 6:29:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/15/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to the Mayor and City Council/OA 97-15 <br />December 15, 1997 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />There is also a difference in architectural standards for accessory structures <br />between property within the urban service area and property outside the <br />urban service area. Metal buildings are allowed in the Rla and A1 districts <br />as long as it is painted so it is compatible with the existing home. Metal <br />buildings are not allowed in the Rlb, Rlc, Rld and Rle districts. <br /> <br />Overview <br /> <br />The different standards applicable to lots within the urban service area and <br />those outside the urban service has been an issue with residents that own <br />large lots within the urban service area. Under the current ordinance, a <br />resident owning 20 acres of land within the urban service area could only <br />have 1200 square feet of accessory building area. However, if that same <br />property was outside the service area they could have 4,500 square feet of <br />accessory building area. The larger lot could easily accommodate more than <br />1200 square feet of accessory building area, but simply because it is within <br />the urban service area it is not allowed. <br /> <br />As the urban service area has expanded to the east, farmers, whose property <br />is located within the urban service area but is still being actively farmed, are <br />impacted. The farmer, if he exceeds 1200 square feet of accessory building <br />area, would not be able to construct the necessary outbuildings needed to <br />sustain a profitable farm. <br /> <br />In order to address the problems associated accessory structures on larger <br />lots within the urban service area, staff is suggesting an ordinance <br />amendment. This amendment would allow larger lots, 5 acres or larger in <br />size, located within the urban service area to have accessory structures <br />based on the same standards as property located in the Rla and A1 districts. <br />For instance, a 5 acre lot in the Rlb district would be allowed 3000 square <br />feet of accessory building area, same as in the Rla district. Lots less than 5 <br />acres would be allowed 1200 square feet, same as the current requirement. <br />Five acres was picked as a cutoff point because that is the minimum size lot <br />needed for agricultural uses in the urban service area. The architectural <br />standards applicable in the Rla and A1 districts would also apply to lots <br />within the urban service area 5 acres and larger. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Meeting <br /> <br />At the November 25, 1997 Planning Commission meeting no one spoke at the <br />public hearing. The Commission recommended approval of the ordinance <br />amendment but modified the allowed maximum accessory structure area. <br />They increased the maximum square feet allowed as follows: <br /> <br />\\elkriver\sys\shrdoc\planning\scottXoa9715cc.doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.