My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7. EDSR 09-11-2006
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2006
>
09-11-2006
>
7. EDSR 09-11-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2011 11:22:45 AM
Creation date
9/30/2011 11:19:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
9/11/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(3) for which taxes have not been paid for at least two previous years. <br />Comment: The more common problem is vacant commercial structures that <br />create blighting influences on their surrounding areas. Occasionally, these <br />properties are also tax delinquent, but the universe of buildings that meet this <br />entire definition is small. It is also signifcant that this definition authorizes <br />condemnation only to "reduce" the properties that meets this definition; there <br />is no concept of an area where some percentage of the buildings are <br />abandoned. <br />4. Removal of a public nuisance. Section 117.025, subd. 9 defines the <br />term to mean public nuisances under Minnesota Statutes, Section 609.74. That <br />section is a criminal statute that requires intent to endanger the genera] public. <br />As such, "public nuisances" are more rare than "blighted areas" and <br />"environmentally contaminated areas," and therefore will have little relevance <br />in the development and redevelopment context. <br />III. EMINENT DOMAIN POWERS REPEALED. <br />The effect of Sections 1 and 2 of the bill summarized above is to repeal the use <br />of eminent domain for all other purposes not specified in those sections. Some <br />of the purposes for eminent domain that were available under prior law include: <br />• Acquisition of vacant parcels, where they were either an element of <br />blight or exhibited inherent problems that impaired development. <br />• Eminent domain to clear title problems (unless one of the new public <br />purpose definitions is also met). <br />• Acquisition of property by cities exercising powers in a municipal <br />development district under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.124 to <br />469.134 (which did not require findings of blight). <br />• Acquisition to promote the development of housing for low and <br />moderate income persons. <br />IV. CONDEMNATION ON AN AREAWIDE BASIS. <br />Under long-established Minnesota law, local authorities have been permitted to <br />use eminent domain to acquire properties needed to carry out development or <br />redevelopment efforts on an area wide basis. That is, once the findings have been <br />made to carry out the various public purposes in the applicable development or <br />redevelopment statute, eminent domain is authorized for all acquisitions needed to <br />carry out that project, whether or not the parcel being condemned has <br />characteristics of blight. <br />111-5 Kennedy & Graven <br />200 South Sixth Street, Suite 470 <br />Minneapolis, MN 55402 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.