My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.6. SR 12-15-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1997
>
12/15/1997
>
6.6. SR 12-15-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:01 AM
Creation date
9/3/2003 6:11:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/15/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The County Board is also considering imposition of an intra-state designation ordinance for <br />the Eastern Sherburne County's refuse. The ordinance would mandate that all refuse in this <br />end of the County, if disposed of in Minnesota, must go the Elk River RDF plant, unless the <br />County approves another destination. The ordinance would not preclude waste from being <br />transported out-of-state, which has been determined to be in conflict with constitutional <br />Commerce Clause law. It now appears the County staff will be recommending to the Board <br />that it table the proposed intra-state designation ordinance pending the outcome of its efforts <br />to execute longer-term waste delivery contracts. <br /> <br />Because the subsidy will be eliminated, and the tipping fees will increase, the County needs to <br />assure that refuse from Eastern Sherburne County will not be hauled to cheaper landfills. Toward <br />this end, the County has also bee negotiating a five-year contract with USA Waste, the new owner <br />of the Elk River Landfill. In the draft contract, USA Waste, which also owns hauling operations, <br />would deliver 30 tons a day to the RDF plant to partially meet the County's obligation. USA would <br />pay the County's escalating tip fees for the waste it delivers to the RDF plant. Combined with the <br />City of Elk River's and the Elk River Area School District's refuse, the proposed deal with USA <br />Waste would bring Sherburne County close to its 50 ton per day obligation to the RDF plant. <br /> <br />CITY'S CONCERN <br /> <br /> 1. Because disposal costs at the Elk River Landfill and other landfills will be significantly <br />lower that the fees at the RDF plant, haulers in Eastern Sherbume County will be able to negotiate a <br />disposal rate with USA Waste or other landfills that could be significantly lower than those <br />established by the County for the RDF plant. City staff have expressed our concern to the County <br />Board and County staff that the County's new approach will likely result in higher garbage rates for <br />residents of Elk River than for other residents in Eastern Sherburne County, whose haulers will <br />likely have negotiated lower rates. City staff has indicated to the County that the City would like to <br />continue delivering its waste to the RDF plant, but that the City may not do so if it results in a <br />significant price difference for the City residents. The County has indicated a willingness to address <br />this issue with the City. Thus, staff is seeking direction from the Council to continue discussions <br />with the County to develop a method to assure the City's waste to the RDF plant, but at rates that <br />are consistent with those paid by other residents of Eastern Sherburne County. <br /> <br /> 2. Attached to this memo is a December 10, 1997 article from the Elk River Star News, <br />which talks about the County's proposed intra-state ordinance. Staff is concerned that if the County <br />enacts the ordinance, this could lead to a situation in which small haulers can no longer compete. In <br />addition, the intra-state ordinance, in combination with the proposed deal with USA Waste, may <br />ultimately end up costing the residents of Eastern Sherburne more than the current $20 refuse <br />surcharge. If the ordinance is not enacted, haulers will have more freedom to choose their disposal <br />options and a more competitive market will exist. Thus, staff seeks direction from the Council to <br />oppose the enactment of the ordinance at this time. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.