My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5. EDSR 09-11-2006
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2006
>
09-11-2006
>
5. EDSR 09-11-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2011 11:16:25 AM
Creation date
9/30/2011 10:07:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
9/11/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Appendix A: One-On-One Interviews <br />Executive Summary <br />Wolf Marketing & Media interviewed 11 past, present and potential clients of the Ciry of Elk River <br />Economic Development Division, as well as partners, developers and builders. The goal of the <br />interviews was to explore attitudes and beliefs regarding the industrial development environment in <br />Elk River and the rest of the Northwest Metro area <br />Some of the notable comments were: <br />^ Clients, partners, developers and builders all agree that clients typically start the site selection <br />process by identifying a particular region of the Twin Cities Metro Axea, such as the Northwest. <br />^ Nearly all said that they prefer to do their initial research online, starting with city Web sites. At a <br />minimum, they expect to fmd lists of avaIlable sites and community demographics. One current <br />client said that a case study that was posted on the City of Elk River Web site was the primary <br />thing that convinced them to learn more about sites in the City. <br />^ The interviewees said that clients narrow their list of potential sites based on a variety of factors. <br />Almost all users consider all of these factors: transportation access, available work force, <br />prevailing local wages, existing utilities and infrastructure, specific buildings and sites, the cities' <br />reputations toward development, and the cities' levels of interest. But the weight they put on <br />each factor varies. <br />^ These factors are explored more deeply as a follow-up to the online research, usually by making <br />direct contact with city staff in the cities under consideration. <br />^ The Northwest Metro is popular among industrial users because it is a growing area with good <br />road and xaIl transportation access (including the future Noxthstar Commuter Rail line), an <br />existing manufacturing-oriented work force, lower wages than the metro core, existing utilities <br />and infrastructure, available buildings and sites, lower real estate costs, communities with apro- <br />business and pro-development reputation, and communities that axe very aggressive regarding <br />economic development. <br />^ Elk River is considered by potential users fox these same reasons. <br />^ The convergence of Highways 169, 10 and 101 in Elk River is considered a major asset due to <br />accessibility, but there are growing concerns regarding traffic congestion. <br />^ Elk River might be less attractive to some potential users because it is further from Interstate 94 <br />than some other Northwest Metro communities <br />^ Most respondents insisted that fmancial incentives axe not the key to making a final decision. <br />But, if all else is equal, they said they can be the deciding factor. <br />.91 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.