My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5. EDSR 09-11-2006
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2006
>
09-11-2006
>
5. EDSR 09-11-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2011 11:16:25 AM
Creation date
9/30/2011 10:07:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
9/11/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Appendix E: Relevant News Articles (cont.) <br />Copyright 2004 Star Tribune <br />Star Tribune (Minneapolis, MN) <br />October 11, 2004, Monday, Metro Edition <br />SECTION: NEWS; Pg, 1B <br />LENGTH: 1434 words <br />HEADLINE: Garbage-fuel plant's future looks messy; <br />Elk River facility is facing waning interest, higher costs <br />BYLINE: Mike Kaszuba; Staff Writer <br />BODY: <br />When President Bush's motorcade traveled past a few weeks ago, Bill Helliwell thought it was best to <br />shut down the Elk River Resource Recovery Facility. <br />He feared that the unexpected explosions that sometimes rock the building might bring more of the <br />kind of publicity that he did not need. <br />There was a time when the $26 million facility was a Hennepin County showcase for turning <br />household garbage into fuel that is used to generate electricity. Nine mostly metro-area counties had <br />helped build two refuse-derived fuel plants during the late 1980s - a sister facility continues to operate in <br />Newport - as an environmentally sensitive answer to the region's mounting garbage. <br />Somewhere along the way, however, things unraveled. <br />"If I had to project back, I don't know if I would have been sold on that technology," Penny Steele, a <br />Hennepin County commissioner, said recently, echoing what others have concluded. "I'm certainly not <br />sold on it now." <br />Although the Elk River facility continues to process as much as 1,500 tons of garbage daily, the world <br />around it has dramatically changed. Hennepin County, which ships the most garbage to the plant, pays <br />an annual service agreement fee that last year stood at nearly $16 million. Since the mid-1990s, the <br />county also has paid additional annual subsidies that topped $7 million in 2003. <br />Most of the counties that ship waste to either Elk River or Newport face similarly escalating costs. <br />That's largely because a 1994 U.S. Supreme Court ruling banned local governments from forcing <br />garbage haulers to take trash to the processing plants. Free to go wherever they wanted, the haulers <br />often chose landfills that imposed lower fees. <br />In order to compete with landfills and yet fulfill a 20-year contract with the plants, the counties had to <br />dramatically drop the tipping charge at the processing plants, effectively subsidizing the Newport and Elk <br />River facilities. In 1990, haulers in Hennepin County were charged $95 to dump a ton of trash at the Elk <br />River plant. By 1997, the fee had fallen to $41 a ton; in 2003 it was reduced to $39.80 per ton. <br />Nearly all of the metro counties that use the two plants have voted not to extend the existing service <br />agreements beyond their 2009 expiration dates. While the votes do not necessarily mean the counties will <br />sever their ties with the facilities, the plants are on the defensive. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.