My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.3. SR 11-24-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1997
>
11/24/1997
>
6.3. SR 11-24-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:01 AM
Creation date
9/3/2003 5:50:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/24/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
debt from past projects. One repayment plan runs through the year 2009 and <br />another repayment plan is completed in the year 2002. In this regard, there <br />will not be monies of any significance available for additional projects until at <br />least 2002. In 2002, an extra approximately $150,000 per year will be <br />available provided the Council continues the tax levy. <br /> <br />One thing that has helped our current financial status is the fact that no <br />major projects were necessary in 1997. However, surprises in surface water <br />management can happen at any time which require expenditures of City <br />funds. Known projects on the horizon include Ditch 28, Business Center <br />Drive extension and Waco Avenue, the Core Village area including the 4th <br />and Norfolk area, County Road 12 project in 1998, and the east Elk River <br />project including Ditch 10 and the connection between 171~t and County Road <br />12. If any of these proiects move forward before 2002 and significant SWM <br />trunk work is necessary, then the current amount of levy annually available <br />will have to go towards a long term bond which will leave nearly zero funds <br />available until around the year 2002. <br /> <br />Overall, this is a very difficult public improvement and financial situation, <br />but we are starting to make progress. Additionally, it is difficult to add more <br />expenses onto development projects, but any additional expense is clearly <br />justified and directly related to the benefit the developer receives. When <br />looking at the Ramsey, Otsego, Burnsville, Lakeville, and Lino Lakes <br />information from a few years ago, a large increase on our SWM impact fee is <br />not out of line. <br /> <br />s:\council\swmfee.doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.