Laserfiche WebLink
To:/~;-~EIk River City Council <br />Fr(~. ~Art and Debbie Johnson <br />Date: November 4, 1997 <br />Subject: Request for variance to build a garage <br /> <br /> On October 28, 1997 1 appeared before the Elk River Planning Commission to request a 23 <br />foot variance to the front setback of our property to build a garage. I presented to them the <br />information that is outlined in the Memorandum prepared by Brady Halversen, Planning Intern. <br /> <br /> Once we completed our request and answered a couple of questions, the public hearing <br />portion ended and the Planning Commission discussed the situation and made the decision to deny <br />our request. The main reason given for denying the request was the fact that we own a relatively <br />large lot, and the garage could be built on the northwest side of the lot, in the area that is marked <br />with the broken lines. <br /> <br /> Since their recommendation came after the public hearing had ended, we did not have an <br />opportunity to explain that their recommendations would not work due to the reasons listed below. <br /> <br /> 1) The garage would be placed in an area that would be less aesthetically pleasing to to our <br />neighbors. <br /> <br /> 2) The buried natural gas lines and telephone lines are in the location of what would be the <br />driveway and we would not want to pave over them in case of a future problem. <br /> <br /> 3) The drain field is currently located where the garage and driveway would be placed, and <br />would not wish to build anything on top of that area. <br /> <br /> 4) An electric utility pole is located in the area that would become a driveway to the new <br />garage. <br /> <br /> 5) <br />one head <br />move the <br /> <br />We would be forced to destroy a portion of the sprinkler system by placing the garage over <br />and the driveway over another head, and I would have to have an irrigation specialist <br />sprinkler heads west of the proposed garage and driveway. <br /> <br />6) A bed of ten rose bushes and peonies would be covered by the driveway. <br /> <br />7) The location of shrubs and rhubarb would have to be changed. <br /> <br />8) A second driveway would have to be constructed and it would take up <br /> a large amount of green space in our yard. <br /> <br /> We take pride in our home and yard an we spend a great deal of time in maintaining both. <br />We strive to make our property attractive and pleasing not only to ourselves, but to our neighbors as <br />well. We feel that we have arranged our yard and landscaped it in a way that is pleasing to the eye <br />and have made an environmentally appropriate use of the space. All of the above reasons would <br />cause more problems than varying the setback at the front of the yard. We truly believe that the <br />location we have suggested is the most sensible location, is the most aesthetically pleasing, and is <br />n the best interest of ourselves and and our neighbors. <br /> <br /> <br />