My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1. SR 11-17-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1997
>
11/17/1997
>
6.1. SR 11-17-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:01 AM
Creation date
9/3/2003 5:39:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/17/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Explanation for Request for Variance <br /> David L. Tollefson <br /> <br />Our family settled in Elk River because of the appeal of open country living on a lot with a <br />view of surrounding wet lands. By following the existing setback ordinance, we could not <br />put a garage where we would like to, because the garage would be too close to the house, <br />making it appear cluttered and squeezed in. <br /> <br />We are requesting a five foot setback from the side of the property line. This would give a <br />more appealing "curb appeal" and would fall in very nicely with a line of existing trees on <br />our lot. <br /> <br />The alternative of putting a garage in back of the power lines would create a need for an <br />extremely long driveway. Winter snow removal makes this option unfeasible, and having <br />the garage out back would not look as attractive. <br /> <br />The land owners adjacent to ours do not use the portion of the lot from the open ditch to <br />our lot, because that portion is not easily accessible to them (they have to access it from <br />the road). We had inquired into buying that portion of their land, but because of the costs <br />involved, decided against it. However, they have no objection with a structure close to <br />the property line. <br /> <br />Because of the possible 60 day application process and full schedule of contractors, the <br />earliest that building could occur would be next spring. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.