My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1. PCSR 09-13-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2011
>
09-13-2011
>
5.1. PCSR 09-13-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2011 2:21:23 PM
Creation date
9/9/2011 2:19:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
9/13/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case File: QJ 11-16 Janet Adams Scrapboolflng <br />Page 3 <br />7. Will fully comply with all other requirements of this Code, including any applicable <br />requirements and standards for the issuance of a license or permit to establish and operate <br />the proposed use in the city. <br />If denial of such a permit should occur, it shall accompany recommendations or determinations by <br />findings or a report stating how the proposed use does not complywith the standards set forth in <br />Section 30-654. <br />In the review of the standards for CUP as outlined, it appears that the request is consistent with all <br />of these standards. <br />Analysis <br />The purpose of a Conditional Use is to allow adjacent, potentially affected property owners an <br />opportunity to comment on a proposed use. Additionally, it allows a city to formally review these <br />potential impacts, and re-inspect them over time, to ensure that these impacts are as described in the <br />permit. <br />At the public hearings for a proposed rezoning to a commercial use in 2008, the Plannirlg <br />Commission and City Council heard comments related to use of the driveway from the adjacent <br />property owner, the concern with loss of privacy into adjacent rear yards, and the overall concern <br />with the expansion of the commercial area into the residential neighborhood, and its potential for <br />noise, traffic, and light disruptions. <br />The review of the proposed conditional use permit included these concerns: <br />Parking: The ordinance requires one parking stall for each guest room, plus one for the employee. <br />There are 2 garage stalls, and room for 6 additional cars along the garage. There appears to be <br />adequate parking on site without the need for additional modifications. Access to the parking area <br />will be via an existing easement on an adjacent property. While during the 2008 CUP review, <br />concern was noted regarding the business use of the shared driveway, there has been no evidence <br />provided that suggests that this easement does not permit a business use of the driveway. The <br />attached site plan sketch shows the proposed parking area. <br />Privacy: During the site inspection, it was noted that the adjacent properties to the south are quite a <br />bit lower than the floor level of the subject property. An existing tree and shrub line provides <br />definition between the subject property and these properties. No other screening is proposed or <br />recommended, as the impact seems negligible, and the screening, to effectively screen from the <br />upper level windows, would have to be 10+ feet height, inconsistent with the residential character <br />sought to preserve. <br />Use of the property: The bed and breakfast model is generally considered an appropriate <br />transitional use between residential and commercial. <br />Maili Street is classified a major collector by the City's transportation plan, meaning it is built and <br />designed to accommodate commercial and residential traffic. <br />N:\Departmnts\CommunityDevelopmrn\Planning\Case Files\CUP\CU 11-16 Janet Adams\CU 101-16 Adams SRto PC 9-13-11.docx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.