My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9.1. SR 09-06-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2011
>
09-06-2011
>
9.1. SR 09-06-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2011 8:41:16 AM
Creation date
9/2/2011 10:15:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/6/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
llLrr~ <br />2012 City of Elk River Budget Prososal <br />$144,789 Current deficit using no tax rate increase. I am very concerned about the tax <br />rate. Tax rate increase to me is increase in taxes. After talking to the County Assessor, he <br />told me residential values are dropping 8-10% in 2012 while commercial is decreasing <br />2%. We take advantage of increased tax revenue from homeowners when their property <br />values go up. Why wouldn't we lower their tax by the same token when their value goes <br />down? Also if tax rate is increased commercial properties will see a substantial increase <br />in 2012 taxes. <br />125,873 Add back in 1 % across the board budget cut <br />(60,000) Cut Energy City program-reduction in hours in Environmental staff. Based on <br />the percentages given to us, Energy City takes approximately 20% of the staff's time. <br />Hour reductions would happen for one or both of the department employees. Project <br />Conserve was budgeted for $10,000. It appears amount will be less than that. Take the <br />lower amount out of Council Contingency. ERMU should manage Project Conserve. <br />(64,000) Put off hiring patrol officer-We operated without this position for most of 2011. <br />150,000 Pay increase for staff (2%). We have a lot of requests for more employees. The <br />majority of taxpayers are asking for reductions in government, not increases. To me, it <br />comes down to either hiring more staff or rewarding the employees who have worked <br />extremely hard to keep us going. I favor rewarding the current employees. <br />(82,000) Lay off building official. The Code Enforcement Official would work 50% of <br />the time in code enforcement and 50% as a building inspector, thus causing on a <br />reduction of four hours per day in the Building department. Code enforcement is more of <br />a discretionary item. From 2005 to 2007 permit income exceeded building department <br />wages and benefits by $1.9 million. From 2008 through June 30, 2011 building <br />department wages and benefits have exceeded permit income by $31,000. <br />(100,000) NTC drops 5%, not 6%. If the NTC does drop by 6%, reduce all budgets by <br />'/2% ($65,000) and add $35,000 to ERMU contribution <br />(115,000) Take from Landfill fund. I don't have a problem using some of this money to <br />help the general fund when it needs it. Extraordinary times require extraordinary <br />measures. <br />ayor John Dietz <br />September 6, 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.