Laserfiche WebLink
i~ <br />r <br />i~ <br />1 <br />7 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />C <br />L <br />ii <br />n <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1. TH 169 at CSAH 81- 79,400 <br />2. TH 7 at CSAH 101- 66,600 <br />3. TH 252 at 85th Avenue - 66,800 <br />4. University Avenue at Snelling Avenue - 59,700 <br />5. TH 252 at Brookdale Drive - 61,300 <br />6. Cedar Avenue at County Road 42 - 75,100 <br />7. TH 7 at Williston Road - 54,900 <br />8. University Avenue at Lexington Avenue - 59,700 <br />9. TH 252 at 66th Avenue - 72,500 <br />10. Hennepin Avenue at Lake Street - 37,000 <br />The screening method demonstrates that because this project has less than the <br />benchmark AADT of 79,400 and does not involve or affect the "Top Ten <br />Intersections," a hotspot analysis is not needed. <br />In summary, under all build scenarios in the design year it is expected there would <br />be slightly higher MSAT emissions in the study area relative to the no build <br />condition due to increased ADT. There also could be increases in MSAT levels in a <br />few localized areas where ADT increases. However, EPA's vehicle and fuel <br />regulations will bring about significantly lower MSAT levels for the area in the <br />future when compared to today. <br />23. Stationary Source Air Emissions. Describe the type, sources, quantities and <br />compositions of any emissions from stationary sources of air emissions such <br />as boilers, exhaust stacks or fugitive dust sources. Include any hazardous air <br />pollutants (consult EAW Guidelines for a listing), any greenhouse gases (such <br />as carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxides), and ozone-depleting <br />chemicals (chlorofluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons or <br />sulfur hexafluoride). Also describe any proposed pollution prevention <br />techniques and proposed air pollution control devices. Describe the impacts <br />on air quality. <br />AUAR Guidance: This item is not applicable to an AUAR. Any stationary air emission <br />source large enough to merit environmental review requires individual review. These <br />types of uses are not anticipated by this project. <br />City of Elk River <br />' Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review <br />August 2011 <br />Page 80 of 90 <br />