Laserfiche WebLink
EPA regazding these rules. There is no scheduled date for the EPA's reconsideration of these <br />rules. <br />A study has been conducted to determine ERMU's options. This study is attached for <br />Commission review. Staff has also received a budgetary quote from a very reputable company <br />to bring the ERMU Power Plant into compliance. The cost estimates used in the study were <br />much higher than the quote. The study indicated total plant upgrade costs to be approximately <br />$500,000. The quote came in for less than $175,000 to retrofit the 4 engines. The 2011 Uniform <br />Rating of Generating Equipment (URGE) test for the power plant will result in $352,968 in <br />compensation from GRE over the next year under the current contract. Not a114 engines would <br />need to be retrofitted. One of the engines could run on natural gas. There aze options. The <br />payback would be relatively short regazdless of which option the Utilities chooses. <br />The Utilities 2011 budget included $100,000 to begin retrofitting these engines knowing that <br />additional costs would be incurred in 2012. At this point, this 2011 capital expenditure would be <br />delayed unti12012. The 2012 budget will include in the capital projects this carried over <br />$100,000 plus an additional amount required to bring a114 engines into compliance with this <br />rule. At this time it would be premature to begin any work until after the EPA has ruled on the <br />comments submitted. <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br />No action requested. <br />