My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. ERMUSR 08-09-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2011
>
08-09-2011
>
5.2. ERMUSR 08-09-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2011 4:11:48 PM
Creation date
8/5/2011 4:10:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
8/9/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Option 2 -Install Emissions Controls on Units 3 & 4 <br />Option 2 could be adopted if EPA kept to its present regulations. Emissions controls <br />could be placed on the Cooper-Bessemer engine and the large Worthington engine. The <br />two smaller Worthington engines could be designated Emergency Units <br />To place emissions controls on Units 3 & 4 would require a cost of $400,000. In 2010, <br />the two units provided capacity credits of $309,936, plus reimbursements for fuel and <br />labor for URGE tests. If ERMU were faced with the choice of putting on the emissions <br />controls, or losing the engine credits, the choice should be to install the emissions <br />controls because the payback would be about 15 months. <br />The emissions controls on each Unit would include a combination direct oxidation <br />catalyst and exhaust silencer to take the place of the existing exhaust silencer. The new <br />system must include a closed crankcase ventilation system, or filtered open crankcase <br />system. An emissions monitoring system must be installed with ongoing emissions <br />records kept at the job site. Approved low sulfur fuel oil must be used in the diesel. <br />After the conversions are completed, testing needs to be done to reduce emissions by <br />70%, or to 23 ppmvd. All units must be compliant with NESHAP by 5/3/2013. <br />Option 3 -Install Emissions Controls on Units 1 & 2 <br />Under Option 3, the same package of emissions controls that are described above for <br />Units 3 & 4 would be installed for Units i & 2. Because Units 1 & 2 are slower in speed <br />and are smaller, the cost/KW of emissions controls would be higher. To install <br />emissions controls on Units 1 & 2 would require a total expenditure of $110,000. In <br />2010, Units 1 & 2 provided capacity credits of $42,504, plus reimbursement for fuel and <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.