My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3. BASR 08-09-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Board of Adjustments
>
BOA Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
08-09-2011
>
3. BASR 08-09-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2011 11:42:08 AM
Creation date
8/5/2011 11:37:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
BASR
date
8/9/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The ordinance, for this property, allows only two detached accessory structures not to exceed 8,000 <br />square feet of total attached and detached accessory structures. <br />There are currently four structures totaling 14,876 sgft. <br />They are requesting four structures totaling 16,040 sgft. <br />APPLICABLE REGULATIONS <br />Based on a Supreme Court action in 2010, if a property can be used in a reasonable manner, a variance <br />should not be granted. The property has a reasonable use with the construction and occupancy of a <br />dwelling unit. <br />Variance Criteria <br />7. Literal en~rcement of the ordinance will cause undue hardsh~. <br />Literal enforcement will not cause undue hardship as the applicant has more accessory structures <br />than allowed by ordinance, even if the proposed building were removed. <br />2. The hardshin is caused by snecial conditions and circumstances which are neculiar to the nronerly and the structure <br />involved and which .are not characteristic o , or a~ilicable to. other lands or structure in the same area. <br />There are no special conditions and circumstances that are peculiar to the property. <br />3. The snecial conditions and circumstances are not a consequence o~the netitioner'.r own action or inaction. <br />There are no special conditions and circumstances to the property. <br />4. The literal annlication o~the nrovisions of this ordinance would denrive the~etitioner o~rights enioved by other~ironerties <br />in the same district under the terms o~,this ordinance. <br />The petitioner would not be .deprived any rights, as they have existing accessory structures. <br />S. The variance will not be injurious to or adversely a,~ect the health, sae or we~are of the residents o the city or the <br />neighborhood where the~iro~ierty is located and will be in keening with snirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />The variance will not be injurious to or adversely affect the health, safety or welfare of the residents <br />of the city. <br />Based on the Supreme Court action, the requested variance should be denied. <br />N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\Variance\V 11-01 Hendricl~c\V 11-01_BA.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.