Laserfiche WebLink
• Site plans for future developments should include measures such as appropriate <br />setback distances, earthen berms, noise walls, and appropriate site design (such <br />as outdoor activity areas being developed away from major noise sources). Each <br />of these items should be considered on a case-by-case basis. The site plans <br />developed for specific projects should show the proposed locations and types of <br />' mitigation, with the estimated noise reductions for all areas projected to exceed <br />noise standards. <br />25. Nearby resources. Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the <br />site? <br />a. Archaeological, historical, or architectural resources? ^Yes ®No <br />b. Prime or unique farmlands or land within an agricultural preserve? ®Yes ^No <br />c. Designated parks, recreation areas, or trails? ®Yes ^ No <br />d. Scenic views and vistas? ®Yes ^ No <br />e. Other unique resources? ^Yes ®No <br />' If yes, describe the resource and identify any project-related impacts on the <br />resource. Describe any measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. <br />Archaeological, historical. or architectural resources <br />Information from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has been obtained <br />and is contained in Appendix B. Based on the SHPO database review, there are no <br />archaeological sites or historic structures identified in the search area. The report, <br />Prehistoric and Euroamerican Archaeology of Elk River Township, Minnesota: <br />' Probability Modeling and Reconnaissance Survey (Rothaus et al. 2005), was also <br />reviewed and did not identify any archeological or historic resources within the <br />study area. Nearly 222 acres, or 88% of the study area, is in agricultural land use. <br />' The western portion of the site does contain more woodland as the site begins to <br />descend toward the Mississippi River, although this only accounts for 6% of the total <br />land cover. Although the Mississippi River is located west of the study area, given <br />' the intense agricultural use it is unlikely that this area would contain any intact <br />archaeological resources. <br />' Prime or unique farmlands <br />Based on the information from the Sherburne County Soil Survey less than 1% of the <br />soils within the study area are considered prime farmland. The soil unit "Elk river " <br />' (map symbol 771 on Figure 16-1) is the only designated prime farmland soil in the <br />study area. <br />These soils are located along the western boundary of the study area along the <br />Mississippi River. Most of the land within the study area is currently in agricultural <br />production. If redeveloped under Scenario 1, an eastern portion of the study area <br />would be designated under agricultural research and portions of the prime farmland <br />soils along the western boundary of the study area would remain as open space. No <br />' farming practices will occur on the prime farmland soils in any development <br />scenario. <br />' Designated parks. recreation areas. or trails <br />Ciry of Elk River <br />Draft Alternative Drban Areawide Review <br />July 2011 <br />Page 79 of 84 <br />