My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. SR 08-08-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2011
>
08-08-2011
>
5.2. SR 08-08-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2011 9:51:07 AM
Creation date
8/5/2011 9:47:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/8/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Site plans for future developments should include measures such as appropriate <br />setback distances, earthen berms, noise walls, and appropriate site design (such <br />as outdoor activity areas being developed away from major noise sources). Each <br />of these items should be considered on a case-by-case basis. The site plans <br />developed for specific projects should show the proposed locations and types of <br />' mitigation, with the estimated noise reductions for all areas projected to exceed <br />noise standards. <br />25. Nearby resources. Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the <br />site? <br />a. Archaeological, historical, or architectural resources? ^Yes ®No <br />b. Prime or unique farmlands or land within an agricultural preserve? ®Yes ^No <br />c. Designated parks, recreation areas, or trails? ®Yes ^ No <br />d. Scenic views and vistas? ®Yes ^ No <br />e. Other unique resources? ^Yes ®No <br />' If yes, describe the resource and identify any project-related impacts on the <br />resource. Describe any measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. <br />Archaeological, historical. or architectural resources <br />Information from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has been obtained <br />and is contained in Appendix B. Based on the SHPO database review, there are no <br />archaeological sites or historic structures identified in the search area. The report, <br />Prehistoric and Euroamerican Archaeology of Elk River Township, Minnesota: <br />' Probability Modeling and Reconnaissance Survey (Rothaus et al. 2005), was also <br />reviewed and did not identify any archeological or historic resources within the <br />study area. Nearly 222 acres, or 88% of the study area, is in agricultural land use. <br />' The western portion of the site does contain more woodland as the site begins to <br />descend toward the Mississippi River, although this only accounts for 6% of the total <br />land cover. Although the Mississippi River is located west of the study area, given <br />' the intense agricultural use it is unlikely that this area would contain any intact <br />archaeological resources. <br />' Prime or unique farmlands <br />Based on the information from the Sherburne County Soil Survey less than 1% of the <br />soils within the study area are considered prime farmland. The soil unit "Elk river " <br />' (map symbol 771 on Figure 16-1) is the only designated prime farmland soil in the <br />study area. <br />These soils are located along the western boundary of the study area along the <br />Mississippi River. Most of the land within the study area is currently in agricultural <br />production. If redeveloped under Scenario 1, an eastern portion of the study area <br />would be designated under agricultural research and portions of the prime farmland <br />soils along the western boundary of the study area would remain as open space. No <br />' farming practices will occur on the prime farmland soils in any development <br />scenario. <br />' Designated parks. recreation areas. or trails <br />Ciry of Elk River <br />Draft Alternative Drban Areawide Review <br />July 2011 <br />Page 79 of 84 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.