My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. SR 08-08-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2011
>
08-08-2011
>
5.2. SR 08-08-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2011 9:51:07 AM
Creation date
8/5/2011 9:47:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/8/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
study scenarios cannot be predicted with enough accuracy to be useful in estimating <br />health impacts. Therefore, the relevance of the unavailable or incomplete <br />information is that it is not possible to make a determination of whether any of the <br />scenarios would have "significant adverse impacts on the human environment." <br />This document acknowledges that the build scenarios may result in increased <br />exposure to MSAT emissions in certain locations, although the concentrations and <br />duration of exposures are uncertain, and because of this uncertainty, the health <br />effects from these emissions cannot be estimated. <br />Although a qualitative analysis cannot identify and measure health impacts from <br />MSATs, it can give a basis for identifying and comparing the potential differences <br />among MSAT emissions, if any, from the various scenarios. The qualitative <br />assessment presented below is derived in part from a study conducted by the FHWA <br />entitled A Methodology for Evaluating Mobile Source Air Toxic Emissions Among <br />Transportation Project Alternatives. <br />For each scenario in this AUAR, the amount of MSAT emitted would be proportional <br />to the average daily traffic (ADT) assuming that other variables such as fleet mix are <br />the same for each scenario. The ADT estimated for each of the build scenarios is <br />higher than that for the no build condition, because the interchange facilitates new <br />development that attracts trips that would not otherwise occur in the area. This <br />increase in ADT means MSAT under the build scenarios would probably be higher <br />than the no build condition in the study area. There could also be localized <br />differences in MSAT from indirect effects of the project such as associated access <br />traffic, emissions of evaporative MSAT (e.g., benzene) from parked cars, and <br />emissions of diesel particulate matter from delivery trucks. Travel to other <br />destinations would be reduced with subsequent decreases in emissions at those <br />locations. <br />For all scenarios, emissions are virtually certain to be lower than present levels in <br />the design year as a result of EPA's national control programs that are projected to <br />reduce annual MSAT emissions by 72 percent from 1999 to 2050, as shown in the <br />following graph. The magnitude of the EPA-projected reductions is so great (even <br />after accounting for ADT growth) that MSAT emissions in the study area are likely to <br />be lower in the future than they are today. <br />City of Elk River <br />Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review <br />July 2011 <br />Page 72 of 84 <br />~i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.