Laserfiche WebLink
study scenarios cannot be predicted with enough accuracy to be useful in estimating <br />health impacts. Therefore, the relevance of the unavailable or incomplete <br />information is that it is not possible to make a determination of whether any of the <br />scenarios would have "significant adverse impacts on the human environment." <br />This document acknowledges that the build scenarios may result in increased <br />exposure to MSAT emissions in certain locations, although the concentrations and <br />duration of exposures are uncertain, and because of this uncertainty, the health <br />effects from these emissions cannot be estimated. <br />Although a qualitative analysis cannot identify and measure health impacts from <br />MSATs, it can give a basis for identifying and comparing the potential differences <br />among MSAT emissions, if any, from the various scenarios. The qualitative <br />assessment presented below is derived in part from a study conducted by the FHWA <br />entitled A Methodology for Evaluating Mobile Source Air Toxic Emissions Among <br />Transportation Project Alternatives. <br />For each scenario in this AUAR, the amount of MSAT emitted would be proportional <br />to the average daily traffic (ADT) assuming that other variables such as fleet mix are <br />the same for each scenario. The ADT estimated for each of the build scenarios is <br />higher than that for the no build condition, because the interchange facilitates new <br />development that attracts trips that would not otherwise occur in the area. This <br />increase in ADT means MSAT under the build scenarios would probably be higher <br />than the no build condition in the study area. There could also be localized <br />differences in MSAT from indirect effects of the project such as associated access <br />traffic, emissions of evaporative MSAT (e.g., benzene) from parked cars, and <br />emissions of diesel particulate matter from delivery trucks. Travel to other <br />destinations would be reduced with subsequent decreases in emissions at those <br />locations. <br />For all scenarios, emissions are virtually certain to be lower than present levels in <br />the design year as a result of EPA's national control programs that are projected to <br />reduce annual MSAT emissions by 72 percent from 1999 to 2050, as shown in the <br />following graph. The magnitude of the EPA-projected reductions is so great (even <br />after accounting for ADT growth) that MSAT emissions in the study area are likely to <br />be lower in the future than they are today. <br />City of Elk River <br />Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review <br />July 2011 <br />Page 72 of 84 <br />~i <br />