My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. SR 08-08-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2011
>
08-08-2011
>
5.2. SR 08-08-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2011 9:51:07 AM
Creation date
8/5/2011 9:47:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/8/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' • Storm water management features should incorporate native plantings of <br />grasses, trees, and shrubs. <br />' • The City will encourage planting of trees suitable for loggerhead shrike habitat <br />along areas that are adjacent to existing cropland and windbreaks if Scenario 2 <br />and 3 develop and the existing windbreaks are removed. CITY - we will review <br />with DNR and modify as necessary. <br />' 12. Physical Impacts on Water Resources. Will the project involve the physical or <br />hydrologic alteration (dredging, filling, stream diversion, outfall structure, <br />diking, and impoundment) of any surface waters such as a lake, pond, <br />' wetland, stream or drainage ditch? ®Yes ^ No <br />If yes, identify water resource affected. Describe alternatives considered and <br />proposed mitigation measures to minimize impacts. Give the DNR Protected <br />Waters Inventory (PWI) number(s) if the water resources affected are on the <br />PWI. <br />Wetland Impact: No specific development plans have been developed for the study <br />area. Both state and federal wetland regulations require avoidance and <br />minimization of wetland impact. However, with anticipated infrastructure needed to <br />' serve the study area such as roads and utilities, it is anticipated some wetland <br />impact would occur. <br /> Approximately 1-2 acres of wetland impact for each scenario could be anticipated as <br /> part of development in the study area. Wetland impact would be subject to State <br /> regulations through the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) and by the City's Wetland <br />' Ordinance. The City is the Local Government Unit (LGU) for the WCA. Impacts <br /> would also be regulated by the US Corps of Engineers through Section 404 of the <br />' Clean Water Act. Wetland impact would need to be avoided and minimized to the <br />greatest extend practical. The wetland complex in the north provides a more <br /> contiguous connection to wetlands and natural areas outside of the study area and <br /> could be incorporated into a larger wetland mitigation and stormwater <br /> management plan for the study area. <br />Impact on Public Waters: There are no DNR Public Waters/Wetlands within the <br />study area as shown on Figure 11-1. The Mississippi River (a DNR Watercourse) is <br />adjacent to the study area. No DNR Public Waters would be impacted by any of the <br />development scenarios. <br />' 13. Water Use. Will the project involve installation or abandonment of any water <br />wells, connection to or changes in any public water supply or appropriation of <br />any ground or surface water (including dewatering)? ®Yes ^ No <br />If yes, as applicable, give location and purpose of any new wells; public supply <br />affected, changes to be made, and water quantities to be used; the source, <br />duration, quantity and purpose of any appropriations; and unique well <br />City of Elk River <br />Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review <br />July 2011 Page 31 of 84 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.