My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INFORMATION EDSR 04-10-2006
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2006
>
04-10-2006
>
INFORMATION EDSR 04-10-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2011 11:23:51 AM
Creation date
8/4/2011 11:20:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
4/10/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A longer school year? <br />dents say: Don't go there <br />By NORMAN DRAPER • ndraper@startribune.com <br />FRIDAY, APRIL 7, 2006 STAR TRIBUNE TWIN CITIHS BS <br />House restricts <br />ds think about a proposal to add five weeks to the school yeaz? The Senate Education Committee got an <br />embers of the committee's Youth Advisory CouncH sat in on discussions of the proposal. The idea, which <br />vnnesota school superintendents, doesn't stand a chance of passing this yeaz and has slim~prospects for <br />years to come. That's partly because of the cost - $700 million a yeaz in extra teacher pay and program- <br />ntingair conditioning -and partly because of lost summer vacation. Elden the proposal's chief Senate au- <br />2-Edina, noted that his stance has made him unpopular among his own four daughters. But proponents say <br />onal classroom days aze needed if Minnesota students are to compete with students from other countries <br />aze in school a lot longer. Here's what some Youth Advisory Council members had to say: <br />SINTHENATION?)) ELIZABETH STEYER Junior,MinnesotaStateAcademyfortheDeaf <br />700 MILLION (IN ADDITIONAL COSTS) INCLUDE <br />iIING FOR THE SCHOOLS? I CAN TELL YOU THAT <br />UNE OR JULY AND IT'S 95 DEGREES AND HUMID <br />D TI"S CALCULUS CLASS, I WILL NOT BE PAYING <br />ATTENTION. I CAN GUARANTEE YOU THAT. )> <br />DYLAN KHLLY Seniox,HighlandPazkHighSchool,St.Pau1 <br />(( LET'S USE THAT <br />MONEY AND MAKE <br />THE TIME WE <br />ACTUALLY HAVE <br />BETTER. LOWER <br />CLASS SIZES AND <br />eminent domain <br />• The move by the House reins in govemment power <br />to seize property, but it didn't end debate for good <br />By DAVID PETERSON <br />dapeterson@s[artribune.com <br />The Minnesota House vot- <br />ed115-171ate'Thursday torein <br />in the use of eminent domain, <br />the process by which govern- <br />ments can take private prop- <br />erty for community or rede- <br />velopmentprojects. <br />But a lengthy battle over <br />whether to exempt two proj- <br />ects seemed to foreshadow a <br />future in which hazd-pressed <br />rnmmunities wme forward to <br />make the case that important <br />ventures could be blocked. <br />Forthe timebeing,however, <br />advocates of the status quo ac- <br />knowledgedthat the vote, rnm- <br />ingafter aneven more lopsid- <br />edvote inthe Senate, amounts <br />to a rnmprehensive defeat. <br />"We have made a very sig- <br />nificant shift in this state on <br />eminent domain;' said Louis <br />Jambois, executive duector of <br />the Association of Metropol- <br />itanMunicipalities. "We have <br />gone from a reasonably liber- <br />al position, nationally, to be- <br />ing one of several states that <br />now severely restrict its use:' <br />Eminent domain could <br />still be used for its tradition- <br />al purposes of acquiring land <br />for things such as roads and <br />schools, thoughboth sides con- <br />cededthat extra layers of pro- <br />tection for property owners <br />would be liable to add millions <br />[o the cost of those deals. <br />What it seeks to throttle <br />backis an increasingmunicipal <br />aggressiveness, ascities age, to <br />acquire blighted properties <br />and tum them over to devel- <br />opers of new projects. Proper- <br />ties deemedblighted rnuld still <br />be acquired. but some cities say <br />the bill sets the bar so high that <br />that will razely happen. Leaders <br />of both parties agree, however, <br />that the bar bas been much too <br />low in the past. <br />"The prior standard for <br />blight was too low, but this <br />bill will gradually erode the <br />very core of our cities;' said <br />Rep. Keith Ellison, DFL-Min- <br />neapolis. "People who live in <br />place with real blight, real mn- <br />tantination, their lives will get <br />worse. People will move to <br />pristine green fields instead." <br />But Jeff Johnson, R Plym- <br />outh, the bID's chief author, <br />said it rights a situation in <br />which government powers <br />grew "extremely expansive," <br />to the point where things be- <br />gan happening that."many <br />people couldn't believe were <br />happening in America." <br />The bill is part of a nation- <br />al explosion of legislation in <br />response to last summer's <br />controversial U.S. Supreme <br />Court decision allowing gov- <br />ernment agencies to acquire <br />private property, regazdless <br />of whether the owners wish <br />to sell it, for purposes of eco- <br />nomic development <br />People on both sides of <br />the Minnesota bill predicted <br />a future in which cities make <br />special appeals for their own <br />projects -and Thursday's <br />session offered evidence. <br />Two legislators - a Dem- <br />ocrat from a fast-ring suburb <br />and a Republican from a rural <br />city -asked their colleagues <br />to exempt major projects un- <br />derway in tbeir rnmmunities. <br />Rep. Bazbaza Goodwin, <br />DFL-Columbia Heights, saiu <br />the bill endangers a proj- <br />ect many df her constituents <br />support. Along Central Av- <br />enue neaz the city's south- <br />ernborder with Minneapolis, <br />she said, the city has invested <br />neazly $1 million already in a <br />project that involves no pri- <br />vate homes, only businesses, <br />but is stalled by a single hold- <br />out. "I have never heazd any- <br />one object to this project;' <br />she said, but it wouldn't qual- <br />ify for eminent domain un- <br />der the bill's new rules, she <br />added. <br />An amendment that would <br />exempt that project, and a <br />bridge in Sauk Rapids, ulti- <br />mately was not adopted, but <br />backers said they'd try again <br />when aHouse-Senate con- <br />ference committee meets. <br />David Peterson • 612-673-4440. <br />BENEFIT FOR THE STUDENTS OF MINNESOTA WHEN WE'RE ALREADY ONE OP <br />Photos by RENEE JONES 6CFBVEIDER <br />reneejones@ startribune.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.