My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.0. EDSR 04-10-2006
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2006
>
04-10-2006
>
6.0. EDSR 04-10-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2011 11:12:40 AM
Creation date
8/4/2011 11:12:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
4/10/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Q: Can repayment for recipients in default be prorated to reflect the length of time a recipient <br />accumulated toward the requirement to continue operations at the site for at least five years <br />after the benefit date? <br />A: No, if a recipient defaults on an agreement, repayment can be prorated based on the recipient's <br />progress toward goal attainment, but not based on the recipient's progress toward the five-year <br />requirement. Any recipient who fails to fulfill the five-year requirement is considered to have <br />defaulted on the agreement and must fulfill repayment obligations, though that repayment may be <br />prorated to reflect partial goal fulfillment. <br />Q: How should agencies calculate the Implicit Price Deflator rate for agreements in default? <br />A: To determine the Implicit Price Deflator rate for an agreement in default, a grantor should calculate <br />the percent change in the Implicit Price Deflator for government consumption expenditures and gross <br />investment for state and local governments from the quarter subsequent to the benefit date to the <br />quarter prior to the date of default. For example, if a recipient defaulted on a $100,000 loan in the <br />fourth quarter of 2000 and the loan was entered into in 1998, then the calculation would be as <br />follows: 112.20 (2000 3`tl Quarter Implicit Price Deflator) / 104.28 (1998 Implicit Price Deflator) _ <br />approximately 1.08 (Loan amount $100,000 X 1.08 = $107,595). <br />The Implicit Price Deflator is prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the United States <br />Department of Commerce. Grantors will not be able to calculate a specific Implicit Price Deflator rate <br />until a recipient has defaulted and the figure for the quarter prior to default is available. <br />Q: If a recipient defaults on a loan given at an interest rate higher than the Implicit Price Deflator <br />rate, can the grantor require that the recipient pay back the loan at that higher interest rate, or <br />must they require that the loan be paid back at the lower Implicit Price Deflator rate? <br />A: Grantors must, at a minimum, require that recipients in default of a business subsidy agreement <br />repay the subsidy at an interest rate set to the Implicit Price Deflator rate. Grantors may require a <br />recipient to pay back the business subsidy at a rate higher than the Implicit Price Deflator rate. <br />Repayment obligations must be specified in the subsidy agreement <br />This sheet is intended to inform agencies of DTED's responses fo frequently asked questions <br />about the business subsidies law, and does not serve as a substitute for statute language. <br />Questions about the law can be directed to DTED: <br />Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development <br />Analysis and Evaluation Offce <br />500 Metro Square <br />121 7" Place East <br />St. Paut, MN 55101-2146 <br />Phone: (651) 296-0580 Faz: (651) 2153841 E-mail: Ed.Hodder@state.mn.us <br />www.dtedstate.mn.us <br />Department of Trade and Economic Development Page 5 of 5 February 20, 2001 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.