Laserfiche WebLink
Housing & Redevelopment Authority <br />June 6, 2011 <br />----------------------------- <br />Page 2 <br />Lance Lindberg, HPC Chair, stated that the HPC is concerned with the future removal of <br />these building, as theyfeel theyhave historic value. He stated that the buildings add to the <br />character of the downtown and could add to economy byproviding alocation for astart-up <br />business. He also felt the integrity of the meat market would change if the buildings were <br />removed. Mr. Lindberg reviewed reasons for preserving and restoring historic buildings, as <br />provided in a presentation to the HPC by Bonnie McDonald of the Preservation Alliance of <br />Minnesota on Apri121, 2011. <br />Mr. Lindberg stated that even though there are buildings older than these in the downtown, <br />these buildings add to the feel of a historic downtown. <br />Chair Wilson stated that the status of the buildings was well-known when purchased bythe <br />HRA for future parking. <br />Mr. Lindberg stated he personally did not see a parking issue in the downtown now He <br />asked if the HRA reallyforesees a need for more parking, since no one knows when the <br />downtown will fill with businesses. Ckrair Wilson sated that business owners in the <br />downtown do have a concern there will not be adequate parking when business space begins <br />to fill in. He stated that the HRA's intent for these properties was to plan for future parking. <br />Commissioner Motin stated that he realizes the property is not needed for parking now, but <br />as buildings fill up, there will be a need for more parking. He stated that the costs of rehab <br />are not less than demolition, but are more. He noted that just to re-roof the buildings would <br />cost $45,000. Also, there would be significant costs to abate the asbestos in the buildings. <br />Commissioner Motin noted that a historical context study was previous completed which <br />determined the buildings have not historical significance. He stated that the propertywill • <br />eventually be needed for parking, in order to preserve the viability of the businesses in the <br />downtown.. Mr. Lindberg asked if the businesses feel they need more parking. <br />Commissioner Motin stated yes. <br />Commissioner Toth stated that the main concern of the businesses is parking for their <br />clientele. He stated that he believes there is no common wall between the 720 Main Street <br />building and Elk River Meats. He felt that parking is an important issue for potential <br />businesses looking at locating in the downtown. Mr. Lindberg stated that people perceive <br />there is a parking problem in the downtown if they can't park in a spot right in front of the <br />building theywish to go to. <br />Ms. Deckert stated that a wall agreement with Elk River Meats was found when doing the <br />title work for the property purchase. <br />Debra Mortenson, Heritage Preservation Commissioner -stated she was also a taxpayer and <br />resident of Elk River. She stated that Elk River's downtown is very small and there are not a <br />lot of historical buildings left. She felt that parking wasn't an issue and she agreed with Mr. <br />Lindberg that business owners perceive a parking problem if clients can't park right next to <br />their businesses. She stated that the onlytime she has had trouble finding a parking space in <br />the downtown is during the Thursday night concerts in the park She felt it does not make <br />sense to tear down a building that could be a potential business, since a parking lot does not <br />generate income. She stated that the city needs to evaluate its spending, since her taxes go <br />up every year. <br />• <br />