My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.0. EDSR 03-13-2006
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2006
>
03-13-2006
>
6.0. EDSR 03-13-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2011 10:08:04 AM
Creation date
8/4/2011 10:08:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
3/13/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1. POLICY PURPOSE <br />Far the purpoe~e~~ of thin document, the term "City" rhald include the Elk River City Council, Fconomu <br />DevelopmentAutharity, and Houring and Redevelofinent Authority. <br />"I'he purpose of this policy is to establish the City of Elk River's position relating to the <br />use of Tax Abatement fox private development above and beyond the requirements and <br />limitations set forth by State Law. This policy shall be used as a guide in the processing <br />and review of applications requesting Tax Abatement assistance. 1'he fundamental <br />purpose of providing Tax Abatement in Elk River is to encourage desirable development <br />or redevelopment that would not otherwise occur but for the assistance provided through <br />the Tax Abatement. <br />The City of Elk River is granted the power to utilize Tax Abatement by the Minnesota <br />Tax Abatement Act, as amended. It is the intent of the City to provide the minimum <br />amount of Tax Abatement, as well as other incentives, at the shortest term required for <br />the project to proceed. Preference is given to projects in which the total amount of'1'ax <br />Abatement request includes participation from the county. The City xeseroes the right to <br />approve ox reject projects on a case by case basis, taking into consideration established <br />policies, project criteria, and demand on city services in relation to the potential benefits <br />from the project Meeting policy criteria does not guarantee the award of Tax Abatement <br />to the project. Approval ox denial of one project is not intended to set precedent fox <br />approval or denial of another project. <br />II. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TAX ABATEMENT AND <br />TAX INCREMENT FINANCING <br />The primary difference between Tax Abatement and Tax Increment Financing (I'IF) is <br />the way in which the dollars are awarded to the project. When TIP is awarded to a <br />project by the city, the other taxing jurisdictions (the school district and the county) arc <br />required to contribute their portion of the increased taxes to the project. Conversely, <br />when Tax Abatement is requested, each political subdivision has the option of gxantuig <br />its portion of the increased taxes to the project Subsequently, the dollars generated fox <br />the project with Tax Abatement axe generally less than the dollars generated with TIF. <br />III. OBJECTIVES OF TAX ABATEMENT <br />As a matter of adopted policy, the City will consider using Tax Abatement to assist <br />private development projects to achieve one ox more of the following objectives: <br />• To retain local jobs and/ox increase the number and diversity of jobs that offer <br />stable employment and/ox attractive wages and benefits as defined in the Ciry's <br />Business Subsidy Policy. <br />• To enhance and diversify the City of Elk River's economic base. <br />• To encourage additional unsubsidized private development in the area, either <br />directly ox indirectly through "spin off' development. <br />Cit3- of Elk River <br />Tax Abatement Policy <br />1"Draft Amended ;~laxch 2006 <br />3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.