Laserfiche WebLink
EDA Special Meeting Page 3 <br />January 6, 1997 <br /> <br /> Jim Brimeyer explained the EDA needs to think about what types of questions the <br /> Strategic Planning Task Force may ask regarding the EDA's recommendations. <br /> <br />5. Business Park (West) Improvement Estimates - Terry Maurer <br /> <br />The preliminary feasibility study for the western area indicates trunk utilities to the <br />west will cost approximately $600,000. Transportation improvements including <br />frontage roads and storm sewer to Waco Street are projected to cost $500,000 - <br />$600,000. Utilities estimates do not include laterals, nor do transportation <br />improvements include internal roads between the frontage road and the County <br />road. Terry noted a recommendation has not been made at this time regarding <br />possible closure of the intersection at the County government center with <br />construction of a frontage road. Bryan Adams asked if costs estimates have <br />been done regarding telephone and natural gas. Terry explained these costs are <br />generally borne by the developer. Bryan noted if the city were to become the <br />developer, these costs estimates would become more important. <br /> <br />Discussion followed regarding the possibility of the city entering into partnerships <br />with a landowners to develop industrial property, holding assessments and <br />outright land purchases. <br /> <br />Paul discussed the phasing concept proposed by staff outlined in his Strategic <br />Planning report dated 12/31/96. It was the consensus that Area 7 be included in <br />Phase II, rather than Phase III as indicated in the report. <br /> <br />EDA Discussion <br /> <br />Commissioner Farber felt the city would face significant public opposition in trying <br />to develop Area 2 as an industrial site. Pat indicated the property owner south of <br />Area 1 would likely wait to see what the demand was for business park sites <br />before developing his property, depending on the cost of assessments. <br />Commissioner Dwyer stated he would prioritize the sites as 3, 5, 6, 7, 2 and 1. He <br />suggested the area directly north of the Sherburne County Government Center, <br />and north of Highway 10 be considered for industrial development. <br /> <br />Paul explained the objective for the next worksession will be to formulate a <br />sample action plan to rezone the recommended areas for industrial <br />development. Consideration should be given to the type of development the <br />city may find acceptable and what an affected landowner may find <br />acceptable. Jim added that each site must be evaluated for appropriate uses. <br />Steve noted the city already has approximately 100 acres of industrially zoned <br />(business park) property in their inventory. <br /> <br />Commissioner Duitsman suggested the property north of west Highway 10, east of <br />Custom Motors be considered for industrial zoning. Discussion followed regarding <br />the need for a frontage road and location of an intersection in this area. <br /> <br />Jim suggested that each of the sites be evaluated with qualifications indicating <br />what makes them an appropriate site, for presentation to the Strategic Planning <br />Task Force. This will be accomplished at the next EDA Strategic Planning meeting. <br /> <br /> <br />