5.2. SR 07-18-2011 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Case File: CU 11-06 Page 3 GENERAL INFORMATEON The Crossing Church Conditional tine Permit Location Existing Use ~ Comprehensive Plan ©esignation Current honing Subject The Crossing Old Town R-4/ C-2 Property Church/ vacant North Elk River High Public/ Semi Public R-1c School South Lions Park Old Town PLD East Single Family Old Town R-2a Residential West _~partment building Old Town R-4 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Conditional Use Permit The issuance of a Conditional Use Permit can be ordered only if the use at the proposed location: ~. 1,Y~ill not endanger, injure or detrirnaental~~ affect the use arzd enjoyment of other-property irr the immediate vicinity or the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience orgenzeral welfare of the nzeighborhood or the city. 2. i.Ylill be consistent wit1~ the comprehensive plan. 3. u%'ill not impede the nzormal and on deny developmenzt and improvement of surrounding vacanzt properly. 4. mill be served adequately by and will not adversely affect essential public facilities and sen~rices including streets, police and fire protection, drainage, r ~se disposal, water and sewer systems, parks anzd schools; and will riot, in particular, create tra~c conzgestion or interference with tra~c on adjacent and raeighboriragpublic thoroughfares. 5. iX~ill riot involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipmerat and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to anypersons orproper~ty because of excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, dust or rribrationzs. 6. i~Ylill not result in the destructionz, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major innapor~tarzce. 7. 1-Vill fully comp~~ with all other r~quirenaents of t1~is Code, inacluding any applicable requiremenats and standards for the issuance of a license or°permit to establish and operate the proposed use in tl~e city. If denial of such a permit should occur, it shall accompany recommendations or determinations by findings or a report stating how the proposed use does not comply with the standards set forth in Section 30-654. In thexeview of the standards for CUP as outlined, it appears that the request is consistent with all of these standards. ANALYSIS Staff has completed the review of the plans, and incorporated them into a comment letter dated June 28, 2011. It is staffs suggestion that these comments be addressed as appropriate, either as revised drawings or noted conditions of approval. On July 6, 2011 a response was received, indicating acceptance of most of the comments. The remaining issues include: N:\Departments\Community Development\Piann;ng\Case Files\CUP\CU 11-U6 The Crossing\CU 11-06 The Crossing Church SR to PC 7-12- 11.doc~: