Laserfiche WebLink
The House Commerce Committee, chaired by Representative Joe Hoppe, Wednesday, <br />May 11 heard a HF 1692, a lengthy, freshly-introduced bill that would make comprehensive <br />changes to Chapter 237, Minnesota telecommunications law. <br />The committee simply discussed the bill, which even the chairman referred to as "the <br />AT&T bill." That tag is certainly troubling to municipal interests. The bill appears to restrict <br />municipal provision of video and Internet services. <br />Section 12 of the bill addresses municipal telecommunications services. It retains the 65 <br />percent super-majority required to construct a new telephone exchange but allows <br />municipalities to enter joint ventures with a "telecommunications organization," which is not <br />defined. <br />Section 13 is troubling. It provides that when a municipality decides to acquire an <br />existing plant by condemnation, the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission will fix <br />compensation. This decision can be appealed to district court. <br />Despite occasional concerted efforts dating back to the late 1990s, Minnesota's nearly <br />century-old telecommunications law has resisted efforts to bring it into the digital age. Does HF <br />1692 signal a new charge to update state telecom law, or is itsimply slate-session curiosity? <br />Time will tell, but we know this: much time will be spent dissecting and examining this bill for <br />possible implications heading into next session. <br />The big news on the energy front is Wednesday's House passage of SF 86, known as the <br />coal moratorium repeal bill. The final bill passed on the House floor on a 76-54 vote. <br />The bill was amended on the floor by its author, Rep. Michael Beard (R-Shakopee) with <br />language that appears to clear the way for Great River Energy to import power into the state <br />from its Spiritwood Station coal-fired plant near Spiritwood, North Dakota. <br />The bill also allows 2,500 megawatts of electric generating capacity, in aggregate, from <br />new large energy facilities or power purchase agreements with new large energy facilities that <br />are fueled by what appears to be, by definition, lignite coal. <br />The 2,500 megawatt provision appears to some observers to be potential trade bait to <br />be used in negotiations with the Governor's office. <br />The bill was approved by the Senate 42-18 on April 14. The Senate is scheduled to take <br />up its omnibus energy bill today. <br />Vol. 14, No. 12 May 13, 2011 <br />