My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. ERMUSR 06-14-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2011
>
06-14-2011
>
4.1. ERMUSR 06-14-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2011 9:44:56 AM
Creation date
6/15/2011 9:44:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
6/14/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
These types of proactive water conservation methods also become important when the need <br />comes to increase our water use appropriations from the Department of Natural Resources <br />(DNR). As you may recall, in September 2006, ERMU submitted to the DNR a Conservation <br />and Emergency Management Plan for Elk River Municipal Utilities Water System. This was an <br />important step in the DNR amending our water use permit increasing our water use <br />appropriations. Attached for reference is the letter from the DNR approving the requested <br />increase in water use appropriations. <br />The bottom line is that imposing water use restrictions on those with private wells will not <br />directly help to mitigate the usage volatility associated with the whole water distribution system. <br />It does communicate a uniform signal to conserve. Imposing the current water use restrictions <br />may not be in line with the thoughts of the City Council. However, it is reasonable to say that <br />the City Council is not as familiar with the specifics to this issue as the Utilities Commission is. <br />The City Council has not had the opportunity to become informed on the specifics of the <br />preservation of this natural resource as the Utilities Commission has. In addition, it may not be <br />received well by the public to be regulated by the government for something they own because it <br />is deemed important for the greater good for the City of Elk River. However, that doesn't mean <br />that it is not the right thing to do. <br />Allowing those with private wells to be exempt from the water use restrictions creates some <br />identification enforcement issues for the water department related to those who are sprinkling <br />with city water. Also, allowing single buildable lots to have a well For sprinkling creates a <br />concern for recording their existence in accordance with our wellhead protection program. The <br />Utilities may need to create an application for these single buildable lots adding a private well for <br />sprinkling so the water department can record those locations for the wellhead protection <br />program. The Water Superintendent has had discussion with the City of Rogers about this <br />concern. The City of Rogers requires a permit for those single buildable lot private wells. There <br />should also be discussion of who and how will they be inspected. <br />The answer falls somewhere between over regulation by the government and unregulated misuse <br />of a natural resource. Currently the Utilities compromises by allowing a residential customer on <br />a single buildable lot to have a private well for sprinkling but they would be required to follow <br />the uniform water use restrictions. If this compromise no longer works, the Commission could <br />consider revising the 2009 resolution such that it does not extend the water use restrictions to <br />those with private wells or does not extend the water use restriction to those outside of the water <br />service area. Or, the Utilities Commission could exempt private wells from the water use <br />restrictions entirely. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.