My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.4.A. PRSR 12 08 2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
P&R Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2004
>
12-08-2004
>
8.4.A. PRSR 12 08 2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2011 12:33:48 PM
Creation date
5/24/2011 12:33:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PRSR
date
12/8/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Park Dedication Revenues 2005-2010 <br />Memo to the Parks and Recreation Commission <br />December 6, 3004 <br />Page 2 <br />Parcels within the Urban Service District <br />I identified five significant parcels within the Urban Service District which will develop in <br />the future. Those properties axe owned by: <br />Miske <br />Turner <br />Foster <br />Buxandt, and <br />Morrell. <br />I assumed all land dedication fox Buxandt, as it is located north of Royal Valley Paxk, and <br />land fox Miske which is currently under consideration (River Paxk). For Fostex's parcel, I <br />anticipate a total number of units of 500 with a land and cash dedication split of 50 percent <br />each. The above assumptions leave a total estimated number of lots in the Urban Service <br />District at 450. These axe spread equally over the years 2008 - 2011. <br />South of County Road 33 Outside of the Urban Service District <br />I identified six significant parcels and assumed that these lots would develop at 2 '/z-acre lot <br />minimums. This provides the minimum number of lots available per development site. <br />Assuming that cluster developments axe pursued, the number of lots would increase based <br />on density bonuses. For the Doebel farm located on the west edge of the City, I assumed a <br />40 percent land dedication, which leaves the total number of lots on these six parcels <br />available fox cash at 261. These lots were evenly spread over the 2006 - 2009 timefxame. <br />North of Counts Road 33 <br />North of County Road 33, the density allowed changes in three phases, July 2005, January <br />2008, and January 2010. In 2005, the development potential could yield 95 lots. 'These were <br />all placed in the 2006 timeframe. In 2008, the development potential yields 4801ots. These <br />were evenly spread over the 2008 - 2011 timefxame. In 2010, the development potential <br />yields 536 lots. One-fourth of these lots were placed in the 2010 and 2011 timefxame, <br />leaving one-half of the lots to be placed in the 2012 and 2013 timefxame, which is beyond <br />the scope of the attached spreadsheet. <br />Fhe attached spreadsheet indicates a "best guess" scenario fox development. Obviously, the <br />market will dictate the rate at which residential, commercial and industrial development <br />occurs and therefore, the numbers of units and the total acreage that is available fox park <br />dedication purposes. No land acquisition was assumed outside of the Urban Service District <br />with the exception of 10 acres from the Doebel farm. Obviously, implementation of the <br />Gxeenway Network with skew the attached spreadsheet, based on acquisition versus cash <br />dedication. <br />Obviously there is a lot of information and assumptions in this memo. If you have any <br />questions, please let me know. <br />S:APIdWNING\Michclc ~fcPhcaonAPARICN RI?CVl2 ON 04 CIP mcmo_Joc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.