Laserfiche WebLink
Green Infrastructure <br />continued from page 5 <br />• Regional Parks and Preserves -Less <br />extensive hubs of regional significance, <br />like the forest preserve system in Cook <br />County, Illinois, provide ecological bene- <br />fits and conserve biological diversity as <br />well as offer important compatible <br />resource-based recreational opportunities. <br />• CulturaVHistoric/Recreational5ites- <br />Community parks or culturaVhistorical <br />sites that provide recreational opportuni- <br />ties, help protect and interpret a com- <br />munity's heritage, and can often serve as <br />an origin or destination for a recreational <br />trail. <br />• Trailheads -Selected ecological, <br />recreational, or culturaVhistoric sites with <br />appropriate visitor services that serve as <br />points of origin or destination linked by <br />trail corridors. Trailheads can occur with- <br />in rural natural areas and working land- <br />scapes or within urban areas ranging from <br />large metropolitan areas to small commu- <br />nities. Trailheads serve as human hubs <br />within greenways systems. <br />Links <br />Many different types of landscape <br />links can go into creating a system of <br />green space. For example: <br />• Landscape Linkages -Large protected <br />natural areas that connect existing parks, <br />preserves or natural areas and provide suf- <br />ficientspace for native plants and animals <br />to flourish while serving as corridors con- <br />nectingecosystems and landscapes. Land- <br />scape linkages can also provide space for <br />the protection of historic sites and oppor- <br />tunities for human use like homing, fish- <br />ing, canoeing, and hiking. <br />• Conservation Corridors -Less exten- <br />sive linear protected areas, such as river <br />and stream corridors, serve as biological <br />conduits for wildlife and, in many cases, <br />also provide opportunities for compatible <br />outdoor, resource-based recreational <br />activities. <br />• Greenbelts -Protected natural lands <br />or working landscapes, such as the one <br />around Boulder Colorado, serve as a <br />framework for development while also <br />preserving native ecosystems and/or pro- <br />ductive farms or ranchland and directing <br />urban and suburban growth. <br />• Trail Corridors -Designated routes, <br />such as rail-trails and greenways, provide <br />access to and appreciation of [he values of <br />natural areas and ocher green spaces, <br />present diverse resource-based outdoor <br />recreational opportunities, and enhance <br />the understanding of historical sites and <br />cultural diversity frail corridors include <br />linear urban open spaces that accommo- <br />date moderate to intense recreational use <br />for residents and visitors. <br />• Utilitarian Corridors -Linear fea- <br />tures, such as powerline and pipeline <br />rights-of-way and canals, can provide a <br />way of connecting recreational, cultural or <br />natural system features. Addison Texas, <br />for example, has created an outstanding <br />park system using utility rights oC way, <br />while communities in New York have <br />used the Erie Canal as the backbone for a <br />series of linear park and recreation areas. <br />WHAT ARE IHE BENEFITS OF <br />A GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN? <br />Green infrastructure initiatives pro- <br />vide ablueprint for conservation the same <br />way long-range transportation plans pro- <br />vide ablueprint for future roads or transit <br />lines. Green infrastructure plans can cre- <br />ate aframework for future growth while <br />also ensuring that significant natural and <br />cultural resources will be preserved for <br />future generations. Green infrastructure <br />plans can even reduce opposition to new <br />development by assuring civic groups and <br />environmental organizations that growth <br />will occur only within a framework of <br />expanded open space and conservation <br />lands. <br />Investing in green infrastructure can <br />also be much more cost effective than <br />building conventional public works pro- <br />jects. Consider flood control. The U.S. <br />Army Corps of Engineers estimates that <br />flood damage in the United States aver- <br />ages more than $4 billion a year. Despite <br />massive investments in dike and levee sys- <br />tems, many communities have learned the <br />limitations of structural approaches to <br />flood control. In fact, it is Far less expen- <br />sive to buy or otherwise protect tloodplain <br />land. Arnold, Missouri, for example, has <br />dramatically reduced the cost m taxpayers <br />of disaster relief and repairing flood dam- <br />age by purchasing threatened properties <br />and creating a greenway in the flood plain. <br />Similarly, green infrastructure can pro- <br />vide ales costly way of assuring safe <br />drinking water. New York City, for exam- <br />ple, avoided the need to spend between $6 <br />and $8 billion on new water filtration and <br />treatment plants by instead purchasing <br />P L d A N I N G C O M M I S S I O N E R S J O U R N d L / V U M 8 E R 3 7 / W I N T E R 2 0 0 0 <br />t <br />t <br />Boil[ between 1828 and 1850, the 185 mile long CErO Canal runs from Washington, D.C_ <br />m Curnberlnnd, Maryland. <br />