My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.0. SR 08-25-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1997
>
08/25/1997
>
8.0. SR 08-25-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/7/2003 1:35:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/25/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1998 Budget Worksession <br />August 25, 1997 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />is due to all the additional work and time required based on the 1997 tax <br />class changes that were signed into law this spring. We will be fortunate to <br />know the growth in our net tax capacity before the end of the calendar year. <br /> <br />In 1996, the city tax rate was 24.033. This was approximately 22.5 percent of <br />the total. In 1997, the city tax rate was 24.683. This was approximately 21.5 <br />percent of the total. In 1997, the total tax rate included the school building <br />levy. It is estimated that the 1998 city tax rate will be somewhat stable and <br />that our percent of the total may decline. <br /> <br />A revenue source that has become a significant issue in the past few years is <br />the COPS FAST funding. Elk River has, or will have, six police officers hired <br />and partially funded under this state and federal program. The revenues for <br />these employees will increase from $101,750 in 1997 to $152,550 in the 1998 <br />budget. The problem that we have as a city is not here in 1998, but will be <br />here in 1999, 2000, and beyond as this $152,550 moves down to zero. These <br />police officer expenses will then have to absorbed within our tax revenue <br />increases. This is true with or without levy limits being in place. This <br />impact could be dramatic upon the city budget. The impact may be felt most <br />in our ability to add additional employees that are necessary for desired new <br />programs. This could impact our ability to hire additional maintenance <br />employees, develop a city engineering department, absorb additional <br />community recreation expenses, add clerical support, etc. We can't really see <br />or touch this problem at this time, but it is very real and will be realized <br />within the next few years. <br /> <br />Two revenue decreases of note in 1998 are the $22,000 reduction from the <br />school for the DARE program and the $25,500 reduction for not planning to <br />use any cash flow reserves to balance the budget. The school reduction <br />assumes the cut of one officer from the DARE program and means that the <br />general fund tax revenues will have to absorb this additional police officer <br />expense. If the school cuts both Elk River DARE officers, then further <br />revenue adjustments will be required. The use of cash flow reserves to <br />balance the budget is not generally recommended. It is okay to use this <br />approach occasionally, but the city does not want to annually be dependent <br />on this budgeting technique. These funds can be very difficult to replace if <br />we use them annually to balance the budget. <br /> <br />One of the biggest positives in the general fund revenues continues to be the <br />monies generated by our growth. These monies include building permits, <br />plan check fees, plumbing and heating permits, planning and zoning fees, etc. <br />The city also continues to try to be conservative in our estimates for these <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.