Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Appeal and Equalization Minutes <br />Apri127, 2011 <br />Page 8 <br />MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER ZERWAS AND SECONDED BY <br />COUNCILMEMBER GUMPHREY TO MAKE NO CHANGE TO • <br />PARCELS 75-597-0110 AND 75-597-0105. MOTION CARRIED 4-0. <br />21. Richard Bury, Parcel Identification Number 75-104-4410 <br />Mr. Riley presented a handout on the above parcel. <br />MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER WESTGAARD AND SECONDED BY <br />COUNCILMEMBER ZERWAS TO ADJUST THE LAND VALUE ON <br />PARCEL 75-104-4410 FROM $78,300 TO $61,100 AS RECOMMENDED BY <br />THE COUNTY ASSESSOR. MOTION CARRIED 4-0. <br />22. Richard Bury, Parcel Identification Number 75-109-1100 <br />Mr. Riley presented a handout on the above parcel. <br />MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER WESTGAARD AND SECONDED BY <br />COUNCILMEMBER ZERWAS TO ADJUST THE LAND VALUE OF <br />PARCEL 75-109-1100 FROM $1,010,100 TO $828,000 AS RECOMMENDED <br />BY THE COUNTY ASSESSOR. MOTION CARRIED 4-0. <br />23. Houlton Investment Company, Parcel Identification Number 75-134-2303 <br />Mr. Riley presented a handout on the above parcel. <br />MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER ZERWAS AND SECONDED BY • <br />COUNCILMEMBER WESTGAARD TO ADJUST THE LAND VALUE <br />OF PARCEL 75-134-2303 FROM $388,000 TO $236,800 AS <br />RECOMMENDED BY THE COUNTY ASSESSOR. MOTION CARRIED <br />4-0. <br />24. Dean and Barbara Johnson Holding LP, Parcel Identification Number 75- <br />627-0110 <br />Mr. Riley presented a handout on the above parcel.. <br />MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER WESTGAARD AND SECONDED BY <br />COUNCILMEMBER ZERWAS TO ADJUST THE BUILDING VALUE <br />OF PARCEL 75-627-0110 FROM $691,800 TO $576,700 AS <br />RECOMMENDED BY THE COUNTY ASSESSOR. MOTION CARRIED <br />4-0. <br />25. Velda Brown, Parcel Identification Numbers 75-024-2411, 75-024-2116, and <br />75-470-0211 <br />Mr. Olson presented a letter submitted by Ms. Brown appealing the value of the <br />three parcels listed above. He stated that he is recommending no change on parcel <br />75-024-2411. He is recommending small changes to the other two parcels because <br />he believes they should be appraised together as one value, even though they must <br />be assessed separately. • <br />