My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.7. SR 08-18-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1997
>
08/18/1997
>
6.7. SR 08-18-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:55 AM
Creation date
8/7/2003 12:51:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/18/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minnesota Department of Transportation <br /> <br />District 3 <br />3725 12th St. N. <br />P.O. Box 370 <br />St. Cloud, MN 56302 <br /> <br /> Tel: 612/255-4181 <br /> Fax: 612/255-3257 <br />Toll Free: 1/800/657-3961 <br /> <br />July 14, 1997 <br /> <br />Steve Ach <br />City of Elk River <br />13065 Orono Parkway <br />Elk River, MN 55330 <br /> <br />Re.' <br /> <br />Guardian Angels Development Near Joplin Street <br />Avenue NW <br /> <br />food Shop Near 197th <br /> <br />Dear Steve: <br /> <br />During our tour of Elk giver on July 2nd you had requested Mn/DOT input on transportation <br />issues related to the abo~{,e referenced proposed developments. Following is our input on the <br />plans developed to date i~or the developments. <br /> <br /> - The plan as currently drawn shows an access to <br />as well access to J6plin Street. In the corridor plan developed for TH 10, <br />placed on an expressway design, where access to and from TH 10 <br />signalized ctions. 'This plan was developed to ensure that traffic <br />would do so at provided the greatest amount <br />have been used to Joplin Street into one of those s~ <br /> <br /> occur at <br />exiting TH 10 <br /> resources <br /> <br />In addition to proposing a <br />closing access locations <br />will be necessary to efficiently <br />Although the plan recog~zed that n~ <br />to existing uses of the accesses, the <br />the use of the unsignalized access <br />in the corridor study on page <br /> <br />of signalized corridor plan also recommended <br />not be si .g 0funsignalized access locations <br />move on TH 10 as the traffic volumes grow. <br /> accesses could be closed immediately, due <br /> recommend that future land use decisions minimize <br /> access at Hudson Street was specifically addressed <br /> <br />"East of Jo access openings will <br />Closure of~ points may be <br /> alternate access to the north <br /> should We made with the intent o: <br />eventually closin~'.'them when possible." <br /> <br />at Hudson Street and Gary Street. <br /> : near future because it would be <br /> )fTH 10. Future land use decisions, <br /> use of these accesses and <br /> <br />An equal opportunity employer <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.