Laserfiche WebLink
Vol. 14, No. 7 March 25, 2011 <br />Municipal and cooperative representatives met with staff from the Minnesota Office of <br />Energy Security yesterday to discuss possible changes to the Conservation Improvement <br />Program statute. Many participants felt progress was made. <br />A number of fairly technical issues were discussed, including: counting energy savings on <br />the utility side of the meter; spending requirements and how to determine program cost- <br />effectiveness; the conservation potential from utility to utility based on size, customer mix, etc.; <br />and a large customer exemption, sought by cooperatives serving ethanol plants. <br />Senate counsel was in the meeting and taking notes. Office of Energy Security staff were <br />fully engaged in the discussion. While noting the validity of many points raised by utilities, Bill <br />Gr_~ OES Deputy Commissioner and former Izaak Walton League leader, noted that utilities <br />weren't the only stakeholders in the process. <br />MMUA favors a full and reasoned discussion of the issues, perhaps over the interim, <br />with changes developed by a technical work group and taken up next session. But the utility <br />industry isn't speaking with one voice and there is an undercurrent for change now. Whichever <br />course this issue takes, we will be fully engaged in the discussion. <br />MMUA continues to work with the League of Minnesota Cities and Legal Aid <br />representatives on HF 562 (Sanders) and SF 406 (Limmer) that would legally authorize <br />manufactured home park owners to sub-meter their park residents for water and sewer <br />charges. <br />The bill mandates that a public water supplier shall impose charges for water or sewer <br />service to manufactured home parks at the lowest rate that is applied for service to single <br />family homes, and may not impose more than one connection fee per metered water or sewer <br />service that is provided to the manufactured home park. <br />The bill is awaiting action on the House floor. The author is waiting, at least for now, for <br />a compromise solution between the municipal and legal aid folks and the Minnesota <br />Manufactured Housing Association. There has been no action, so far, on the Senate bill. <br />A number of water issues remain intertwined this session, including HF 135 SF 64, which <br />repeals city authority to regulate private wells. These bills remain where they were a week ago: <br />The House bill has passed two committees and is now in the House Environment, Energy and <br />Natural Resources Policy and Finance Committee. The Senate companion, SF 64, hasn't moved <br />yet but pressure will grow if the House bill continues to progress. <br />