Laserfiche WebLink
City Coundl Muiutes Page 13 <br />July 16, 2007 <br />• Mr. Barnhart stat a timeframe would be unique for ch case because it would depend <br />on where in the city th sign was located and this wool evaluated during the conditional <br />use process by Council <br />MOVED BY COUNCI ER GUMP REY AND SECONDED BY <br />COUNCILMEMBER FARB TO AD ORDINANCE 07-10 AMENDING <br />SECTION 30-1 KDEFINITIO " SECTION 30-864 KCHANGEABLE <br />COPY" OF THE CITY CODE O INANCES. CASE NO. OA 07-09. <br />Councilmember Motin <br />~e 30 square feet <br />Ms. Carney stated only ti~changeable portion <br />MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br />~. <br />7.1. Consider Tobacco License-The Piecemaker <br />Ms. Allard presented the staff report <br />of the sign would be considered as part of <br />sign would be considered <br />Chief Beahen stated Mr. Peplinski was convicted of a misdemeanor for disorderly conduct <br />on February 13,1999, in Saint Louis County. He noted the convictions in the staff report <br />were juvenile convictions and couldn't be considered by Council. <br />Pat Briggs, owner of the building where applicant is considering operating his tobacco <br />establishment Stated it can be difficult for a person to remember convictions that may have <br />happened in their past He stated Mr. Peplinski made no direct intentions to hide or falsify <br />information on his application. He stated he completes his own background/credit checks <br />on people going into his buildings. <br />Councilmember Motin stated a person should remember if they were convicted of a crime. <br />Mr. Briggs stated he wouldn't know if he had any convictions in his past <br />Chief Beahen stated the other business owned by the applicant is known as a head shop. He <br />further expressed concern with Mr. Peplinski's background. He stated this business will be <br />located adjacent to a grade school and within two blocks of a high school He stated he is <br />unsure of the applicant's intention for this shop. <br />Damon Peplinslsi,1453513~ Avenue North, Plymouth-Stated the disorderly charge <br />against him was a misunderstanding. He stated the owner was going to drop the charges but <br />he couldn't because the cops were already at the establishment He stated he reviewed his <br />background check as completed by Mr. Briggs and seen that he didn't have any <br />misdemeanor convictions so he didn't include it on his application. <br />Mayor Klinzing questioned the chief why the applicant would not get the conviction listed <br />in the background check completed by Mr. Briggs. <br />Chief Beahen stated police departments have access to more information than regular <br />citizens, thus he has much more detailed information. He stated there is a lot of information <br />on Mr. Peplinski that he can't disclose and this leads to other concerns. <br />