My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1. SR 07-21-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1997
>
07/21/1997
>
5.1. SR 07-21-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:53 AM
Creation date
8/6/2003 7:00:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
7/21/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ELK RIVER ARENA <br />1000 SCHOOL STREET N.W. <br />ELK RIVER, MN 55330 <br /> <br />To: Pat Klaers <br /> <br />From: Rich Czech <br /> <br />Subject: P.A. System <br /> <br />Date: July 17, 1997 <br /> <br />Dear Pat, <br /> <br />I have received four quotes regarding possible P.A. systems for the arena. Over the past <br />few weeks, I have had the opportunity to listen to each of the four different systems. <br />Three of the systems were operating in ice arenas, the fourth system was in the gym at the <br />Elk River Senior High School. Each system had either the same or very similar <br />equipment to the equipment quoted for our building. <br /> <br />Acoustic Communication is the company that Maple Grove Arena selected. When I <br />listened to their system, I heard a lot of reverberation. Because of this, the system <br />seemed to posses poor intelligibility. I have had limited conversations with the sale <br />representative since receiving their bid and, as of yet have not received any literature <br />regarding the system components. Due to this, I am unable to comment on the <br />components at this time. The sales representative appears to be disinterested in selling us <br />his system which leads me to wonder what type of service we would receive if Acoustic <br />Communication is chosen. The system lacks a equalizer that is a key component in fine <br />tuning the sound in the building. The lack of enthusiasm on the sales representatives part, <br />as well as the apparent poor sound quality leads me to not recommend the system from <br />Acoustic Communication for our arena. I have however included the price of the system <br />and the components in which they have proposed for the building. (Please see attachment <br />item A for quote and components) <br /> <br />The second company that submitted a quote (please see attached item B for quote and <br />components) is Urban Communication. At this time they do not have any systems <br />installed in arenas. While the main part of their business is in rental and special events, <br />they have installed a few systems in gyms and auditorium including the gym at the Elk <br />River Senior High School. When listening to the system I found the intelligibility to be <br />very good and the sound was consistent throughout the gym. Since the arena is much <br />larger area and does not features acoustic materials that the gym has which help promote <br />good acoustics, I question if we would be able to experience the same results. This quote <br />also is missing some key components, Tape deck, C.D. player, Tuner, Equalizer, and a <br />storage rack to store all of the components. 16nowing that this company has mainly deals <br />with rentals and special events and we have no other arena to compare the system to I feel <br />that it is best to explore our options with an other company. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.