Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes <br />January 18, 2011 <br />Page 8 <br />be permanent residency in a campground is contrary to the specific language of the statute <br />and to its intent. He stated Minnesota Statute Chapter 327 also regulates manufactured home • <br />parks which are intended for permanent residency and the statute incorporates a number of <br />protections for permanent residents in mobile home parks that clearly intends that there will <br />be a higher standard of both the vehicles/dwellings in a manufactured home park as <br />opposed to a camping area. <br />He noted the closing of Wapiti Park in January/February was a staff recommendation that <br />was not adopted by the City Council. He stated it was clear from the City Council that it was <br />going nowhere and staff was directed to find another way to address the permanent <br />residency issue which has been a concern with the campground for over 20 years. <br />He stated staff has done a number of things to research the campground in determining <br />compliance with state law and one was to check with Sherburne County on the tax status of <br />vehicles. He noted this finding shouldn't be characterized as an allegation and there is <br />sufficient factual bases to support it in the resolution. He noted some of the vehicles are <br />taxed as a mobile home. <br />He stated the evidence to justify the health issues are in the staff reports submitted by the <br />Environmental Division. He noted the fact that solid waste has been recovered from the <br />river over the years and is the justification for the Solid Waste Plan. He noted this Plan has <br />not yet been submitted. He stated the city has asked for documentation of compliance of the <br />septic system to Pollution Control Agency standards as outlined in state statute. He stated <br />the city provided the applicant with the building official's advice as to the requirements of <br />this process. He stated a Pollution Control Agency licensed inspector must do the inspection <br />and there is a three step process for it. He stated it is the city's responsibility to confirm that <br />the septic system (which is located in the flood plain) is functioning and not polluting the <br />river. <br />He noted the Police Department staff report has been included and supports the finding <br />related to public safety concerns. <br />He stated there is not a discrepancy in the number of conditions and noted that there are 17 <br />conditions and one of them specifically incorporates the conditions from the 1984 Permit <br />He stated Condition 8 & 9 from that Permit haven't been complied with. He stated the <br />resolution before the City Council does not make a finding with respect to the non- <br />compliance with any of the other seven conditions from the 1980's Permit. <br />He stated what he has heard and discussed with staff is an effort to make sure Wapiti Park <br />functions as a campground per the statute which authorizes the city to ensure its ordinances <br />are complied with. <br />He stated Wapiti Park went ahead and built the building on reliance that the Interim Use <br />Permit would be for the full 10 years as they wanted. He stated staffs position is that it <br />could be renewed for another 10 years if the long outstanding issues related to the <br />campground that it serves can be addressed. <br />Councilmember Motin stated he recalls when this issue came up in 2000. He stated land was <br />being developed rapidly and Council struggled with how to let Wapiti stay in business when <br />they had a use which the city was unable to let them stay in business. He stated the decision <br />was made to go with the Interim Use Permit. He stated at that time the representatives of • <br />Wapiti Park did not expect to be in business in ten years. He stated if anyone at that point <br />