My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2. PRSR 01-06-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
P&R Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2004
>
01-06-2004 SPECIAL
>
2. PRSR 01-06-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2011 8:11:00 AM
Creation date
2/4/2011 8:10:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PRSR
date
1/6/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to the Park and Recreation Commission <br />Park and Recreation Direccor <br />Special Meeting January 6, 2004 <br />Page 2 <br />The Park Foreman would office in Lions Park Center along with the director and other <br />recreation staff. <br />The Commission should note that the Facility Coordinator identified in the 2001 report has <br />been hired. <br />Location <br />Lions Park Center is the home to the recreation department at this time. The office space <br />was designed with the thought that a director would be hired at some time in the future. <br />The director needs to be located in the same building as the staff that they are going to be <br />supervising. While parks and planning need to work together, the Park and Recreation <br />Director does not need to be located in City Hall. The internal review process is such that <br />the director would be included in all meetings regarding development. In addition, the <br />current Planning staff has enough familiarity with the Park Plan to be able to advocate the <br />Commission's position with developers when necessary. The park planner is utilized often <br />by off-site staff for specialized projects. In addition, it is unlikely for the director to be <br />assigned non-park related items from the City Administrator if they are located off-site. <br />Job Description <br />Review of the job description is a key component to the hiring process. All applications will <br />be evaluated based on the qualifications identified in the description, both minimum and <br />preferred. Some things to consider include: <br />Type of degree - is one preferred over another? <br />Years of experience -minimum and preferred <br />Type of experience <br />Location of applicant (Minnesota applicants may have an edge due to their familiarity <br />with the state laws) <br />While line staff applications are often evaluated based on a "point scale", department head <br />level positions are evaluated based on the qualifications listed in the job description. Ckher <br />items that are evaluated include whether the person is making an advancement or a lateral <br />move in their career, if they have been unemployed or out of the profession for a period of <br />time, or other "subjective" items. The key is having a thorough and detailed description of <br />the job and minimum/preferred qualifications as the basis of the evaluation to cull <br />applicants. <br />Hiring Process <br />At the department head level, the process utilized has typically included a selection <br />committee of two commissioners, two Councilpersons, and two staff. Occasionally, a <br />professional "headhunter" has been utilized to review applicants on behalf of the city. The <br />two staff are present to provide support, reference material, and an occasional opinion; the <br />do not vote. The Commissioners and Councilpersons make the recommendation to the <br />Council which then approves the hiring. The director will be reporting to the City <br />Administrator and working ultimately for the City Council. It will not be possible for the <br />S:\PLANNING\Michele McPherson\PARKNREC\Depanment Investigation\12 22 03 memo to P & R.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.